Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry, in the Midwest we have a lot of flat lands with corn and soya beens
so it is very easy to find a place to test after the harvest. Watched somebody operate one of these and I wopuld expect that you would take an average of say 5 flights each before the battery die. One may see reflections off of a corn cob that has not been gleaned. 27 Mhz was not my frequency of choice but this was available. Planes are two engine type and are controlled by turning the motors on or off for turns..... no flap movements....very simple I would think that doing a distance comparison is more believable when seen than any manufacturers specs and would give me sufficient guidance when an improvement occurs. I certainly think it would add crededance when observed at a club meeting even tho gurus with a little bit of knoweledge will require more sophisticated equipment. If I was comparing one manufacturer to another with respect to R/C controlled equipment it sure would satisfy me as seeing is believing . When I asked for comment I had already put in place all the good things and it was my expectations that the group would focus on the negatives which is how it came out with a balancing list of negatives to compare Appreciate the comments Art "Jerry Martes" wrote in message ... "Art Unwin KB9MZ" wrote in message m... Invariably when antenna gain is mentioned questions arise as to gain measurement and accuracy there of. I do a lot of antenna experiments and declarations of gain never get any where. Ihave now purchased a 27 Mhz electric model airoplane and am now in the process of making a new design antenna and I intend to measure an antennas relative gain my comparing the distance travelled by the model by usind a standard whip antenna and then by using newly designed antenna. I visualise keeping a record of distance travelled of my various experiment antennas. Does any body see any negatives about this aproach which will always be done under zero wind conditions? I am looking for a real world guide to gain to escape from the gain arguments of today. Thanks in advance Art Art If I'd be allowed to change my mind after I got more thought/information on this project, I really like the idea. It will be somewhat of an instrument complex project ?wont it?. A GPS could record alot of data if the plan includes things like that. I would have thought that small variations in distance to the aircraft wouldnt be excessively critical. But, it would be important to keep records of the angle to the aircraft from the antenna. I see Excel and some clocks somewhere in there. This sure would be a fun project. If you do get it working, I'd go to where you are just to see it in action. Jerry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna tuner | Antenna | |||
Unity Gain? | Antenna | |||
Ten-tec vee beam | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient Smoke Clears a Bit | Antenna | |||
Hy Gain TH3 MK3 triband Beam | Antenna |