Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Roger Hayter
writes Ian Jackson wrote: In message , rickman writes On 7/3/2015 2:50 AM, Jeff wrote: Are you suggesting that the conjugate match will reflect back to the antenna 100% of the original reflected wave from the antenna? Yes, it must. For example with an external ATU that provides a conjugate match it is clearly the case that if a 1:1 VSWR is achieved then no reflected power reaches the TX. (as shown on an SWR meter between the Tx and ATU.) I am very certain that this assumption is not correct. I wish I had the math to back me up. The only total reflection I am aware of is an open circuit which of course absorbs no power at all. Here is a point. The VSWR only shows no power being sent back to the txmt output. That does not mean no power is absorbed from the reflected wave by the matching circuit. I believe the example you gave was Z of 1063 -j0. Isn't that a real impedance of 1063 ohms which is equivalent to a resistor? Resistors dissipate power don't they? I have to admit that I am, to some extent, confused. Maybe it helps to look at the situation from the point of view that the matching circuit doesn't 'know' that there is a reflected wave. All it sees is the impedance looking into the sending end of the coax - and this is whatever is on the antenna end, transformed by the length of coax. The load the matching unit sees could be replaced with the same physical values of L, C and R, so there IS nowhere for a reflected wave to exist. Provided the TX sees a 50 ohm load when looking into the input of the matcher, there will be no theoretical losses. However, a real-life matcher WILL have loss, and so will the coax. Also, the coax will have a loss greater than when it is matched, mainly because of the 'I -squared R' (literal) hot-spots. Surely it *is* the reflected wave that mediates the transformation of the aerial impedance to what is seen at the transmitter end? The transmitter sees the vector sum of all the waves traversing the transmission line at that point. Or else how would it "know" what was happening at the other end? I guess that until reflections are received back from the far end of the coax, the transmitter will see the 50 ohms Zo (surge impedance) of the coax. But once things have settled worn, the transmitter neither knows nor cares what's at the far end. All it knows is that the load presented to it isn't what it ought to be. But insert a matcher, and it will be as happy as Larry. The system will work fine, but will suffer the penalty of the additional SWR losses on the coax, and those of the matcher. Provide these are not unacceptable, the benefit is that all the matching can be done in the comfort of shack. -- Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave |