Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:22:19 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:
As for a simpler way, I'd recommend a remote auto-matcher like an SGC at the antenna base. It will minimise coax losses and should give you a good match, at least for most bands. I've used a similar set up (with radials) and achieved a good match even on 80m. If your radio has a built in tuner, then it can be used to 'tweak' the match in the event the radio isn't 'seeing' 1.5:1. Turn it off initially. Let the SGC find a match. If it isn't ideal, use the local ATU for a final tweak. I never found this was required but YMMV. Not everyone is a true believer in antenna tuners: http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/Hombrew-Mobile%20Antennas.html I've done some admittedly crude testing of various matching contrivances by measuring the resultant field strength for a given RF power level (measured at the antenna connector). Although not conclusive or spectacular, the early model automagic antenna tuner was rather lossy. Incidentally, I contrived a rather crude but effective way to measure relative overall efficiency. I measured the power consumption from the AC line with a Kill-a-Watt meter (in watts, not VA) and adjusted the CW RF output for some reference level on the field strength meter. While this would not give me a real number for the efficiency, it does produce relative numbers for comparing antenna matching devices. Unfortunately, I can't find my results, but I do recall that the winner was a simple 4:1 torroidal matching xformer. Remember, you really want a low SWR for two reasons, one because modern radios demand it but also to reduce coax (or feeder) loss. With an matcher at the antenna feed point, coax losses are minimised. An ATU at the TX end does nothing to reduce coax losses in real terms. Coax losses below 500 MHz are mostly in the I^2R losses of the copper (as limited by skin effect). Above 500MHz, the dielectric gets involved. See Fig 4: http://www.maximintegrated.com/en/app-notes/index.mvp/id/4303 Higher RF currents, caused by low impedance terminations, will cause higher I^2R losses. These higher losses are why very low impedances are not popular for RF power devices. This has NOTHING to do with matching. For a given RF current through the coax, the contribution of the coax to overall losses will be independent of the VSWR. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave |