Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:22:19 +0100, Brian Reay wrote: As for a simpler way, I'd recommend a remote auto-matcher like an SGC at the antenna base. It will minimise coax losses and should give you a good match, at least for most bands. I've used a similar set up (with radials) and achieved a good match even on 80m. If your radio has a built in tuner, then it can be used to 'tweak' the match in the event the radio isn't 'seeing' 1.5:1. Turn it off initially. Let the SGC find a match. If it isn't ideal, use the local ATU for a final tweak. I never found this was required but YMMV. Not everyone is a true believer in antenna tuners: http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/Hombrew-Mobile%20Antennas.html Interesting. I'm off on a different approach. I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between the ATU and the antenna. I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:08:56 -0700, "Wayne"
wrote: I'm off on a different approach. I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between the ATU and the antenna. I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter. Rewind. I just noticed that you're planning to put the RF ammeter between the ATU and the antenna. That will work, but with approximately 1200 ohms antenna impedance, you are going to see 50/1200 = 0.04 times the antenna current that you would see on the 50 ohm line between the xmitter and the ATU. If you're running lots of power, that might work, but offhand, methinks not. Also, you can't adjust the ATU for maximum current. It adjusts itself based on it's own internal VSWR sensor. All you can do is watch the light show and listen to the relays clatter. You might be able to have some control if it were a motorized antenna tuner. Certainly a manual antenna tuner would work. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 17:08:56 -0700, "Wayne" wrote: I'm off on a different approach. I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between the ATU and the antenna. I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter. Rewind. I just noticed that you're planning to put the RF ammeter between the ATU and the antenna. That will work, but with approximately 1200 ohms antenna impedance, you are going to see 50/1200 = 0.04 times the antenna current that you would see on the 50 ohm line between the xmitter and the ATU. If you're running lots of power, that might work, but offhand, methinks not. Also, you can't adjust the ATU for maximum current. It adjusts itself based on it's own internal VSWR sensor. All you can do is watch the light show and listen to the relays clatter. You might be able to have some control if it were a motorized antenna tuner. Certainly a manual antenna tuner would work. This isn't something planned. I have been using the ammeter between the tuner and antenna for many years. With an automatic tuner, there is no feedback from the ammeter to the tuner. In that case it is simply an indicator that current is present. Some of my antennas have SWR outside the capabilities of my automatic tuner. A manual tuner is used in that case. With a manual tuner, I don't look for a specific reading, just a peak in the current from the tuner to the antenna. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/5/2015 7:08 PM, Wayne wrote:
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:22:19 +0100, Brian Reay wrote: As for a simpler way, I'd recommend a remote auto-matcher like an SGC at the antenna base. It will minimise coax losses and should give you a good match, at least for most bands. I've used a similar set up (with radials) and achieved a good match even on 80m. If your radio has a built in tuner, then it can be used to 'tweak' the match in the event the radio isn't 'seeing' 1.5:1. Turn it off initially. Let the SGC find a match. If it isn't ideal, use the local ATU for a final tweak. I never found this was required but YMMV. Not everyone is a true believer in antenna tuners: http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/Hombrew-Mobile%20Antennas.html Interesting. I'm off on a different approach. I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between the ATU and the antenna. I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter. Hey, Wayne - As a matter of curiosity on my part, can you find a way to measure the ammeter's resistance and let me know the full-scale value? Many thanks, John |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John S" wrote in message ... On 7/5/2015 7:08 PM, Wayne wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:22:19 +0100, Brian Reay wrote: As for a simpler way, I'd recommend a remote auto-matcher like an SGC at the antenna base. It will minimise coax losses and should give you a good match, at least for most bands. I've used a similar set up (with radials) and achieved a good match even on 80m. If your radio has a built in tuner, then it can be used to 'tweak' the match in the event the radio isn't 'seeing' 1.5:1. Turn it off initially. Let the SGC find a match. If it isn't ideal, use the local ATU for a final tweak. I never found this was required but YMMV. Not everyone is a true believer in antenna tuners: http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/Hombrew-Mobile%20Antennas.html Interesting. I'm off on a different approach. I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between the ATU and the antenna. I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter. Hey, Wayne - As a matter of curiosity on my part, can you find a way to measure the ammeter's resistance and let me know the full-scale value? No, I don't have enough test equipment to easily do that. With a DVM it measures 0.4 ohms and with a VOM measures 28 ohms. And the VOM gives no needle movement. It is a O. D. McClintock Signal Corp typs I S-III with full scale of 2.5 amps. Since it was salvaged from some WW II equipment back in the 1950s, it probably isn't calibrated. But, it gives a useable relative reading. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/7/2015 10:14 AM, Wayne wrote:
"John S" wrote in message ... On 7/5/2015 7:08 PM, Wayne wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:22:19 +0100, Brian Reay wrote: As for a simpler way, I'd recommend a remote auto-matcher like an SGC at the antenna base. It will minimise coax losses and should give you a good match, at least for most bands. I've used a similar set up (with radials) and achieved a good match even on 80m. If your radio has a built in tuner, then it can be used to 'tweak' the match in the event the radio isn't 'seeing' 1.5:1. Turn it off initially. Let the SGC find a match. If it isn't ideal, use the local ATU for a final tweak. I never found this was required but YMMV. Not everyone is a true believer in antenna tuners: http://www.qsl.net/g3tso/Hombrew-Mobile%20Antennas.html Interesting. I'm off on a different approach. I have an RF ammeter mounted in a box. The box is in the shack between the ATU and the antenna. I simply adjust the ATU for max current on the ammeter. Hey, Wayne - As a matter of curiosity on my part, can you find a way to measure the ammeter's resistance and let me know the full-scale value? No, I don't have enough test equipment to easily do that. With a DVM it measures 0.4 ohms and with a VOM measures 28 ohms. And the VOM gives no needle movement. It is a O. D. McClintock Signal Corp typs I S-III with full scale of 2.5 amps. Since it was salvaged from some WW II equipment back in the 1950s, it probably isn't calibrated. But, it gives a useable relative reading. Many thanks for the info. The reason I asked was that I thought it might be possible to build one. I need a starting point. Again, thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave |