| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
July 10th 15, 07:34 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
An antenna question--43 ft vertical
rickman wrote:
On 7/10/2015 1:39 PM, wrote: standing waves are a consequence of a VSWR greater than 1:1 on a transmission line. Did you really write that? The standing waves are a consequence of a standing wave ratio of greater than 1:1? As VSWR is a consequence of an impedance mismatch, yes. You keep ignoring or failing to understand that part. No matter what you call it, a value of greater than 1:1 indicates an IMPEDANCE mismatch. If the equations that describe VSWR were discovered by Dr. Snagpuss and the effect were named after him, then the statement would be that a Snagpuss greater than 1:1 causes standing waves on a transmission line. An IMPEDANCE mismatch on a TRANSMISSION LINE results in standing waves. It is irrelevant what you call the value, only the value itself is of any importance. -- Jim Pennino |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
| Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
