| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
July 10th 15, 07:34 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
An antenna question--43 ft vertical
rickman wrote:
On 7/10/2015 1:39 PM, wrote: standing waves are a consequence of a VSWR greater than 1:1 on a transmission line. Did you really write that? The standing waves are a consequence of a standing wave ratio of greater than 1:1? As VSWR is a consequence of an impedance mismatch, yes. You keep ignoring or failing to understand that part. No matter what you call it, a value of greater than 1:1 indicates an IMPEDANCE mismatch. If the equations that describe VSWR were discovered by Dr. Snagpuss and the effect were named after him, then the statement would be that a Snagpuss greater than 1:1 causes standing waves on a transmission line. An IMPEDANCE mismatch on a TRANSMISSION LINE results in standing waves. It is irrelevant what you call the value, only the value itself is of any importance. -- Jim Pennino |
|
#3
July 10th 15, 09:28 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
An antenna question--43 ft vertical
rickman wrote:
On 7/10/2015 2:34 PM, wrote: rickman wrote: On 7/10/2015 1:39 PM, wrote: standing waves are a consequence of a VSWR greater than 1:1 on a transmission line. Did you really write that? The standing waves are a consequence of a standing wave ratio of greater than 1:1? An IMPEDANCE mismatch on a TRANSMISSION LINE results in standing waves. First you say the standing waves are a result of the SWR being greater than 1:1, now you say it is a result of the impedance mismatch. I'm *so* confused....  Are you serious? SWR is a measure of impedance match. A SWR greater than 1:1 indicates an impedance mismatch. An impedance mismatch results in standing waves on a transmission line. What is so difficult to understand about that or are you fixated on the "SW" standing for "standing wave" in the name of the measurement? I'm getting the impression you are being water boarded and will say anything you think will make it end! Give us a location and we will save you! I'm getting the impression you are playing stupid just for the sake of arguing. -- Jim Pennino |
|
#4
July 10th 15, 09:51 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
An antenna question--43 ft vertical
On 7/10/2015 4:28 PM, wrote:
rickman wrote: On 7/10/2015 2:34 PM, wrote: rickman wrote: On 7/10/2015 1:39 PM, wrote: standing waves are a consequence of a VSWR greater than 1:1 on a transmission line. Did you really write that? The standing waves are a consequence of a standing wave ratio of greater than 1:1? An IMPEDANCE mismatch on a TRANSMISSION LINE results in standing waves. First you say the standing waves are a result of the SWR being greater than 1:1, now you say it is a result of the impedance mismatch. I'm *so* confused.... Are you serious? SWR is a measure of impedance match. A SWR greater than 1:1 indicates an impedance mismatch. An impedance mismatch results in standing waves on a transmission line. What is so difficult to understand about that or are you fixated on the "SW" standing for "standing wave" in the name of the measurement? I'm getting the impression you are being water boarded and will say anything you think will make it end! Give us a location and we will save you! I'm getting the impression you are playing stupid just for the sake of arguing. Guilty as charged. How about you? -- Rick |
|
#5
July 10th 15, 10:02 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
|
An antenna question--43 ft vertical
rickman wrote:
On 7/10/2015 4:28 PM, wrote: rickman wrote: On 7/10/2015 2:34 PM, wrote: rickman wrote: On 7/10/2015 1:39 PM, wrote: standing waves are a consequence of a VSWR greater than 1:1 on a transmission line. Did you really write that? The standing waves are a consequence of a standing wave ratio of greater than 1:1? An IMPEDANCE mismatch on a TRANSMISSION LINE results in standing waves. First you say the standing waves are a result of the SWR being greater than 1:1, now you say it is a result of the impedance mismatch. I'm *so* confused.... Are you serious? SWR is a measure of impedance match. A SWR greater than 1:1 indicates an impedance mismatch. An impedance mismatch results in standing waves on a transmission line. What is so difficult to understand about that or are you fixated on the "SW" standing for "standing wave" in the name of the measurement? I'm getting the impression you are being water boarded and will say anything you think will make it end! Give us a location and we will save you! I'm getting the impression you are playing stupid just for the sake of arguing. Guilty as charged. How about you? At least I know what a transmission line actually is while you obviously do not. -- Jim Pennino |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Vertical Antenna Performance Question | Antenna | |||
| Antenna Question: Vertical Whip Vs. Type X | Scanner | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Technical Vertical Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
| Short STACKED Vertical {Tri-Band} BroomStick Antenna [Was: Wire ant question] | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
