Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri
What I find hard to understand is that the University has placed its name behind it.! The professors at the university had years to review the design and I presume stood behing it. I also understand that actual measurements were taken albiet possibly with misuse of equipment.. I also find it odd that the ARRL did not get a jump on it before today as the inventor has connections with them. and wide spread notice that he also was a ham. FCC is probably snickering now about ham operator statments including those of the ARRL comments regarding use of power lines Its a shame that the ARRL will take a laid back aproach on this antenna until they have had a chance to review comments from elswhere. There must be something that was missed at the show possibly because of a prior belief that it was a fake regardless of what he said. In the mean time I accept your analysis sinc eyou were there as was Chip. Hopefully Tom W8TI was there and jotted down drawings from the' how to make' session so that he can point out errors and falacies in the analysis from the first session where many graphs were presented of the findings and possibly the technology behind it Regards Art "Yuri Blanarovich" wrote in message ... Did they mention where an actual drawing can be found or if an indepth descriptive article can be found? Thanks Art What I described, says it all. The variation from the helically wound coil at the bottom half of the radiator is the trombone like "coil" or loading stubs. Looks like one or two turn trombone loading stubs along the radiator. This should model in EZnec and show how the current decreases. Not much different from the loading coil at the base, which any mobile aficionado knows is the worst place to put the loading coil at. Again. It is vertical, working against radials, or screen, loaded at the base with helical coil or trombone, then piece of tubing, then loading coil, than piece of tubing (stinger) or top hat. You can play with any sizes you like, it will not beat "classic" whip with loading coil about 2/3 up the radiator. When the patent is issued and published, you will be able to see where the "secret" is. He promised to have something on the web site, but I did not bother to take a note of it. 73 Yuri, K3BU.us www.computeradio.us home of Dream Radio One |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |