Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy NGers,
I was curious about another "miracle" short vertical, being subject of great interest, patent by Robert Vincent and Physics dept. of University of Rhode Island. I got up at 4 am, drove to Boxboro ARRL convention and eager to see what are we missing. Not much! Giveaway was opening statement something like: how to make shortened antenna with more gain (compare to what? I guess light bulb :-) In the "theoretical" portion of the presentation audience was told that current across the helical coil decreases away from the feed point, while across loading coil it stays constant. Due overcrowding of "inventor" I did not persist in breaking through and asking for enlightenment. Author claims more gain (familiar), better bandwidth (doesn't get it why) and small size (of course). Showing measured graphs with current and phase distribution along the radiator. Works very well! (Many stations worked.) He showed how to measure current at the antenna using ferrite pickup transformer way up the antenna and cables to the instrument (handsomely detuning and distorting the measurements). I suspect that "broad bandwidth", (SWR 2:1) was achieved thanks to losses in the coils and dielectric, as "confirmed" by his statement that coils were fried when power was applied. What is it? Basically helically wound coil starting from the base, about half way up the radiator, then piece of straight tubing, than loading coil, then tubing and in some case top hat (works better :-). Matching to 50 ohms is done by picking tap at the base, few coil turns up. That is 3D version. He showed some "2D" versions, having "coils" made of basically coil formed as hairpin loops instead of classic solenoid, also the loading coil. So kind of 2D - 3D antenna :-) I wanted to make a bet that my single loading coil loaded vertical would cream the "miracle", but there were so many worshippers paying compliments to the inventor, that I resigned not to stay for the second hour of lecture how to build it. I saw no trace of any modeling, just experiments using wrong tools. So brace yourselves for another "miracle" in the arsenal of very small and more efficient antennas. It should be a hit with CBers and other suckered users. So that's it (oh, no chokes in the feedlines), I hope U of RI is proud of this breakthrough, I can sleep well now. Back to DR1. Yuri, K3BU with more info that could have saved lotsa experimenting at http://www.k3bu.us/loadingcoils.htm |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
HF Vertical design(s) | Antenna | |||
Poor vertical performance on metal sheet roof - comments? | Antenna |