Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:05:41 GMT, "
wrote: verification of my assumption that extra radiation becomes available. Hi Art, Extra? From where? What is the source? If it is the same source, then it is not Extra, but simply managed to fit a need. In this sense you still have to balance the budget of what you got, and what you radiate and what you lose (to heat). The budget does not allow Extras. The budget does however allow you to transfer balances as long as you maintain the same total. In this sense, it is like stacking elements with the correct phase relationships to move radiation that would have gone to the clouds, towards the horizon. You are still radiating the same power, but the relationship change has netted more of it going in a direction more suitable to your needs. Now, as to the matter of bends in the antenna doing this; then the literature is rich in examples to this matter. The Franklin antenna comes to mind. It has lots of bends specifically tailored to create this budget shift. It has been around for 70 or 80 years? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission line radiation | Antenna | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Incoming radiation angles | Antenna | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna |