Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 03:52 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:49:21 GMT, "
wrote:

No Richard I am not trolling I am very serious.


No Art, you are trolling. There is no one in this group who could
accelerate charge without power BUT YOU? Absurd in the extreme!

You have shown absolutely no interest in participating in a rational
discussion about the requirments of circular motion, but instead you
cavalierly discard all of established physics going back to Newton.

Hence your contempt of the topic clearly reveals you are trolling.
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 05:15 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You are welcome to your opinion and it has been duly noted and you can now
move on. I have no intention
of accepting your bait for another raucuos R.R.A.A. battle upon which you
thrive upon to create division.


Art


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:49:21 GMT, "
wrote:

No Richard I am not trolling I am very serious.


No Art, you are trolling. There is no one in this group who could
accelerate charge without power BUT YOU? Absurd in the extreme!

You have shown absolutely no interest in participating in a rational
discussion about the requirments of circular motion, but instead you
cavalierly discard all of established physics going back to Newton.

Hence your contempt of the topic clearly reveals you are trolling.



  #3   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 05:22 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:15:50 GMT, "
wrote:

You are welcome to your opinion and it has been duly noted and you can now
move on. I have no intention
of accepting your bait for another raucuos R.R.A.A. battle upon which you
thrive upon to create division.



More troll bait
  #4   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 06:43 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Art is obviously a well educated person having the ability to express
himself in plain English better than most.

Unfortunately the technical content of his writings are pure gibberish,
giving an intelligent reader the impression he is having his leg pulled -
or being trolled. I cannot make any sense out of what he says and his
reasoning. I gave up trying a long time ago.

As he so frequently admits, he is unable to understand what he himself is
talking about.

(Incidentally, Richard, you have Art's characteristics reversed. But the end
result is the same - too often I can't understand what it is you are
waffling about.)

Art, may I suggest that before you write you think in QUANTITATIVE terms
about what you want to say. Put some numbers and physical shape into it.
Draw pictures. Solve your own problems. Go back to Ohm's Law and square 1.
Otherwise you will continue to think in emotional terms without being able
even to visualise, to picture, the subject matter.

Emotions and feelings are not a part of engineering except on pay-day. But
the sheer beauty of deriving equations followed by logical calculation,
especially when it gives the right answers, is something which no human
should be deprived of.

As for Richard, old-man, there's no hope for you. ;o)
----
Reg


  #5   Report Post  
Old August 17th 04, 08:39 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:43:58 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

we are to consider:
Emotions and feelings are not a part of engineering except on pay-day.

contradicted within one sentence by:
As for Richard, old-man, there's no hope for you. ;o)


At last reckoning, for you blokes on the dole, this isn't pay-day.
You two are ancient enough to have a grudge against Richard III.

Well, that was fun as long as no one cares to talk about serious
radiation questions. ;-)

Or even calibrated mud.... (talk about a lack of QUANTITATIVE terms)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Transmission line radiation Ron Antenna 16 April 26th 04 01:03 AM
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles Ray Gaschk Antenna 3 February 21st 04 12:26 AM
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency Reg Edwards Antenna 23 January 10th 04 11:56 AM
Incoming radiation angles Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 33 January 5th 04 11:11 PM
Measuring radiation resistance Reg Edwards Antenna 11 December 13th 03 12:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017