Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:49:21 GMT, "
wrote: No Richard I am not trolling I am very serious. No Art, you are trolling. There is no one in this group who could accelerate charge without power BUT YOU? Absurd in the extreme! You have shown absolutely no interest in participating in a rational discussion about the requirments of circular motion, but instead you cavalierly discard all of established physics going back to Newton. Hence your contempt of the topic clearly reveals you are trolling. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are welcome to your opinion and it has been duly noted and you can now
move on. I have no intention of accepting your bait for another raucuos R.R.A.A. battle upon which you thrive upon to create division. Art "Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:49:21 GMT, " wrote: No Richard I am not trolling I am very serious. No Art, you are trolling. There is no one in this group who could accelerate charge without power BUT YOU? Absurd in the extreme! You have shown absolutely no interest in participating in a rational discussion about the requirments of circular motion, but instead you cavalierly discard all of established physics going back to Newton. Hence your contempt of the topic clearly reveals you are trolling. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:15:50 GMT, "
wrote: You are welcome to your opinion and it has been duly noted and you can now move on. I have no intention of accepting your bait for another raucuos R.R.A.A. battle upon which you thrive upon to create division. More troll bait |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art is obviously a well educated person having the ability to express
himself in plain English better than most. Unfortunately the technical content of his writings are pure gibberish, giving an intelligent reader the impression he is having his leg pulled - or being trolled. I cannot make any sense out of what he says and his reasoning. I gave up trying a long time ago. As he so frequently admits, he is unable to understand what he himself is talking about. (Incidentally, Richard, you have Art's characteristics reversed. But the end result is the same - too often I can't understand what it is you are waffling about.) Art, may I suggest that before you write you think in QUANTITATIVE terms about what you want to say. Put some numbers and physical shape into it. Draw pictures. Solve your own problems. Go back to Ohm's Law and square 1. Otherwise you will continue to think in emotional terms without being able even to visualise, to picture, the subject matter. Emotions and feelings are not a part of engineering except on pay-day. But the sheer beauty of deriving equations followed by logical calculation, especially when it gives the right answers, is something which no human should be deprived of. As for Richard, old-man, there's no hope for you. ;o) ---- Reg |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 17:43:58 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: we are to consider: Emotions and feelings are not a part of engineering except on pay-day. contradicted within one sentence by: As for Richard, old-man, there's no hope for you. ;o) At last reckoning, for you blokes on the dole, this isn't pay-day. You two are ancient enough to have a grudge against Richard III. Well, that was fun as long as no one cares to talk about serious radiation questions. ;-) Or even calibrated mud.... (talk about a lack of QUANTITATIVE terms) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Transmission line radiation | Antenna | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna | |||
Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Incoming radiation angles | Antenna | |||
Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna |