| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message
... On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 5:27:41 AM UTC-5, gareth wrote: What is the nature of free space such that it requires antennae to be at least 1/4 wave before accepting radiation efficiently? Ding, ding, ding. Totally false statement. Don't pass go, don't collect $200. Convince yourself by calculating the retarded potential from a far field when the same field strength comes from a dipole and when it comes from a short antenna. You find that there has to be more power fed into the short antenna (irrespective of feed impedances and ohmic resistances) to achieve that same field strength. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| When can a radio be called "vintage"? | Boatanchors | |||
| More Corporate Welfa "CONservative Capitalist "Free Market"Laissez Faire Republican Hypocrite Talk Radio Flunkies Silent As TaxpayersBail Out AIG With $85 Billion | Shortwave | |||
| What's in a "wall wart" so-called "transformer"? | Homebrew | |||
| Nature of "ground" beneath my house? | Antenna | |||
| Why Is a Ship Called: "She"? :-) | Boatanchors | |||