Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "gareth" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 5:27:41 AM UTC-5, gareth wrote: What is the nature of free space such that it requires antennae to be at least 1/4 wave before accepting radiation efficiently? Ding, ding, ding. Totally false statement. Don't pass go, don't collect $200. # Convince yourself by calculating the retarded potential from a far field # when # the same field strength comes from a dipole and when it comes from a short # antenna. #You find that there has to be more power fed into the short antenna # (irrespective of # feed impedances and ohmic resistances) to achieve that same field strength. Well, I don't know what you are calling "retarded potential". At any rate, if the radiated power is equal for two different antennas, why would the field strength be different, except as related to pattern differences? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When can a radio be called "vintage"? | Boatanchors | |||
More Corporate Welfa "CONservative Capitalist "Free Market"Laissez Faire Republican Hypocrite Talk Radio Flunkies Silent As TaxpayersBail Out AIG With $85 Billion | Shortwave | |||
What's in a "wall wart" so-called "transformer"? | Homebrew | |||
Nature of "ground" beneath my house? | Antenna | |||
Why Is a Ship Called: "She"? :-) | Boatanchors |