| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
September 11th 15, 06:20 PM
posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
|
|||
|
|||
Furthe questions to the RF Photonists amongst you.
On 9/11/2015 6:44 AM, gareth wrote:
2. If you claim that your RF photons are generated by the same intra-atomic processes that generate light, then why do we need the so many trillions of atoms that make for a half-wave dipole? They aren't needed. We have already given you an example of RF radiation from an atom in the MRI. You say somehow that is related to "near-field", but that is meaningless in this context. -- Rick |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The RF photonists | Antenna | |||
| A question for the RF Photonists amongst you | Antenna | |||
| Question Guy's Questions Raises More Questions | Shortwave | |||
| ATV questions | Equipment | |||
| BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
