Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/11/2015 1:22 PM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message ... On 9/11/2015 6:44 AM, gareth wrote: 2. If you claim that your RF photons are generated by the same intra-atomic processes that generate light, then why do we need the so many trillions of atoms that make for a half-wave dipole? They aren't needed. So we could have antennae that are only one molecule high, do you mean? It would be very hard to drive. I think the impedance would be phenomenally small. -- Rick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The RF photonists | Antenna | |||
A question for the RF Photonists amongst you | Antenna | |||
Question Guy's Questions Raises More Questions | Shortwave | |||
ATV questions | Equipment | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |