![]() |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/16/2015 5:10 AM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message ... On 9/15/2015 2:55 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: He is a troll, pure and simple, and has been at it since 1997. I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him rather than simply discuss. Most of those who argue with him are actually being trolls themselves, not unlike a group gathering around a fight cheering it on, being part of the reason to fight in the first place. And now, by resorting to personal attacks, you yourself become the troll In the 21 years since 1994 that I have been a subscriber to amateur radio NGs, there has been neither any trolls, nor the origination of personal attacks by me. ROFLMAO! That's the funniest line I've heard this entire year! But then delusional people actually believe things like this. snip -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry ================== |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:09:15 +0100, Jerry Stuckle
wrote: On 9/16/2015 5:10 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... On 9/15/2015 2:55 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: He is a troll, pure and simple, and has been at it since 1997. I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him rather than simply discuss. Most of those who argue with him are actually being trolls themselves, not unlike a group gathering around a fight cheering it on, being part of the reason to fight in the first place. And now, by resorting to personal attacks, you yourself become the troll In the 21 years since 1994 that I have been a subscriber to amateur radio NGs, there has been neither any trolls, nor the origination of personal attacks by me. ROFLMAO! That's the funniest line I've heard this entire year! But then delusional people actually believe things like this. snip Oh dear, the loons are out again. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:38:59 -0400, rickman wrote:
On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. So why are you enabling? Frustration. You may have missed what rec.radio.amateur.antenna was like before he arrived. There were a fair collection of very knowledgeable experts present, that were able to answer most questions. There were also very interesting discussions, on such things as fractal antennas and modeling. I was involved with several people reverse engineering an MFJ-1800 antenna. I won't claim to be anywhere near as knowledgeable as these people. I read, I learned, I tried to answer a few questions, and I made a fool of myself displaying my ignorance in a few areas. Today, these people are gone or hiding. Nothing of any technical interest has appeared for many months. We are now blessed with discussions of quantum physics, which have no relevance to antenna design. We are deluged with stupid questions by Gareth which rapidly morph into discussions about the details of Gareth's perceived persecutions. I have yet to see any calculations or real antennas. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!activity/rec.radio.amateur.antenna/xnXlqNH1MAAJ I just hate to see graffiti on a wall, garbage in the streets, and Gareth in this newsgroup. Staying quiet hasn't worked, so I decided it was worth one last try, which apparently has failed. Yes, I became part of the problem, but I think it was worth the risk. Too bad it didn't work. I'm not sure what to next. I'll probably just resort to selectively reading posts by those that I know are knowledgeable and have something to offer. I also have a real live genuine antenna problem that I can't solve. I'm not ready to post it yet, but soon. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? I don't know. Neither shoving a mirror in his face or ignoring him seems to be working. My current solution is to simply add a filter to Forte Agent newsreader, that reduces the number of acceptable cross posted newsgroups from my current 3 to 1 for this group. Since Gareth likes a large and unwilling audience for dramas, that should drop any threads he originates. http://www.forteinc.com/agent/faq.php#BAF8BFCB74FE9B17852571C0000D3065 No follow ups please. It's not worth the effort. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/16/2015 1:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:38:59 -0400, rickman wrote: On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. So why are you enabling? Frustration. You may have missed what rec.radio.amateur.antenna was like before he arrived. There were a fair collection of very knowledgeable experts present, that were able to answer most questions. There were also very interesting discussions, on such things as fractal antennas and modeling. I was involved with several people reverse engineering an MFJ-1800 antenna. I won't claim to be anywhere near as knowledgeable as these people. I read, I learned, I tried to answer a few questions, and I made a fool of myself displaying my ignorance in a few areas. Today, these people are gone or hiding. Nothing of any technical interest has appeared for many months. We are now blessed with discussions of quantum physics, which have no relevance to antenna design. We are deluged with stupid questions by Gareth which rapidly morph into discussions about the details of Gareth's perceived persecutions. I have yet to see any calculations or real antennas. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!activity/rec.radio.amateur.antenna/xnXlqNH1MAAJ I just hate to see graffiti on a wall, garbage in the streets, and Gareth in this newsgroup. Staying quiet hasn't worked, so I decided it was worth one last try, which apparently has failed. Yes, I became part of the problem, but I think it was worth the risk. Too bad it didn't work. I'm not sure what to next. I'll probably just resort to selectively reading posts by those that I know are knowledgeable and have something to offer. I also have a real live genuine antenna problem that I can't solve. I'm not ready to post it yet, but soon. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? I don't know. Neither shoving a mirror in his face or ignoring him seems to be working. My current solution is to simply add a filter to Forte Agent newsreader, that reduces the number of acceptable cross posted newsgroups from my current 3 to 1 for this group. Since Gareth likes a large and unwilling audience for dramas, that should drop any threads he originates. http://www.forteinc.com/agent/faq.php#BAF8BFCB74FE9B17852571C0000D3065 No follow ups please. It's not worth the effort. Too long, didn't read... -- Rick |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
Can I suggest people remove the moderation group when responding to
this thread. One of Evans' ploys is to crosspost to unrelated groups to spread his poison. No point in helping him. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Indeed, he seems to have been screaming for attention all day. No doubt he will continue this evening. Is it any wonder his vapourware projects never progress and he never actually seems to improve his knowledge, beyond learning a few 'buzz words' to initiate his goading threads. Such negative displacement activity probably accounts for his failures. Once again, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, the sole purpose of your post is to vent your spleen in a personal attack; an attack that is confabulated and false and that has nothing to do with amateur radio or to these NGs. Why do you continue to behave in that manner that all grown-ups left behind in the kindergarten school? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
... There were also very interesting discussions, on such things as fractal antennas and modeling. Once again your post is a thinly-disguised vehicle for an infantile personal attack, and shame on you for that. However, in the light of your comment above that I have quoted, why do you not find the discussions to be of interest that I introduce for two reasons, firstly because the points interest me , and secondly to enliven an almost-dead group? I never originate any abusive remarks in the manner that you exhibit. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Can I suggest people remove the moderation group when responding to this thread. One of Evans' ploys is to crosspost to unrelated groups to spread his poison. No point in helping him. Once again, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, your post is nobbut a vehicle for you to vent your spleen in confabulated and false personal attacks. Why do you behave like that, in the manner of a 5-year-old in the kindergarten playground? Perhaps you failed to notice that my OP in this thread was very much to criticise you in person for the very reason that you illustrate above? Have you nothing of relevance to these NG to contribute? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:25 -0400, rickman wrote:
Too long, didn't read... "Sorry, but I didn't have time to make it shorter." (Blaise Pascal, Mark Twain, and others). "Nothing of importance has ever been said on one line" (Me) -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:25 -0400, rickman wrote: Too long, didn't read... "Sorry, but I didn't have time to make it shorter." (Blaise Pascal, Mark Twain, and others). "Nothing of importance has ever been said on one line" (Me) "The drinks are on the house." -- Jim Pennino |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com