| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the
congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? Neither of them seem to bear any relevance either to amateur radio or to these NGs, so why are they not only tolerated, but also encouraged by responding to them? One of them proposed a Project Shun, so perhaps now is the time for him to reap what he has sown? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
In article ,
"gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this Depends upon what you mean by "this". Three newsgroups appeared in the "Newsgroups:" header of your message, and will appear in the response I am now making. and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? I subscribe to rec.radio.amateur.antenna, not the other newsgroups. Until it got invaded by cross-posters from certain other groups, it USED to contain mostly things about ANTENNAS. It was fun to read back then. David, W8EZE 1949-1967 and VE7EZM + AF7BZ since 2013 -- David Ryeburn To send e-mail, change "netz" to "net" |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"David Ryeburn" wrote in message
... In article , "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this Depends upon what you mean by "this". Three newsgroups appeared in the "Newsgroups:" header of your message, and will appear in the response I am now making. and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? I subscribe to rec.radio.amateur.antenna, not the other newsgroups. Until it got invaded by cross-posters from certain other groups, it USED to contain mostly things about ANTENNAS. It was fun to read back then. David, W8EZE 1949-1967 and VE7EZM + AF7BZ since 2013 Those of we who wish to discuss antennAE and related phenomena or noumena are not invaders. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth"
wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. Whether the responses are sympathy, hostility, or technical doesn't matter because all you're interested in is getting some attention, whether negative, positive, or informative. Every single one of your postings have begun with a personal insult, either to an individual or to the group, which seems more appropriate to starting a bar room fight than a technical discussion. You don't care about ham radio antennas because I suspect you've never actually built or designed a working antenna. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_mentality https://healthpsychologyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/the-victim-personality/ -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
"David Ryeburn" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this Depends upon what you mean by "this". Three newsgroups appeared in the "Newsgroups:" header of your message, and will appear in the response I am now making. and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? I subscribe to rec.radio.amateur.antenna, not the other newsgroups. Until it got invaded by cross-posters from certain other groups, it USED to contain mostly things about ANTENNAS. It was fun to read back then. David, W8EZE 1949-1967 and VE7EZM + AF7BZ since 2013 Those of we who wish to discuss antennAE and related phenomena or noumena are not invaders. On this side of the pond, antennae are on insects and antennas are on radios while noumena is the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. -- Jim Pennino |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"gareth" wrote:
"David Ryeburn" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this Depends upon what you mean by "this". Three newsgroups appeared in the "Newsgroups:" header of your message, and will appear in the response I am now making. and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? I subscribe to rec.radio.amateur.antenna, not the other newsgroups. Until it got invaded by cross-posters from certain other groups, it USED to contain mostly things about ANTENNAS. It was fun to read back then. David, W8EZE 1949-1967 and VE7EZM + AF7BZ since 2013 Those of we who wish to discuss antennAE and related phenomena or noumena are not invaders. You are a twaet, though, Gaereth. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"gareth" wrote in message
... "David Ryeburn" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this Depends upon what you mean by "this". Three newsgroups appeared in the "Newsgroups:" header of your message, and will appear in the response I am now making. and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? I subscribe to rec.radio.amateur.antenna, not the other newsgroups. Until it got invaded by cross-posters from certain other groups, it USED to contain mostly things about ANTENNAS. It was fun to read back then. David, W8EZE 1949-1967 and VE7EZM + AF7BZ since 2013 Those of we who wish to discuss antennAE and related phenomena or noumena are not invaders. Wrong again Beanie, antennae are attached to insects. Of course in the case of a flea brain like you maybe there's an exception. -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.uk |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. So why are you enabling? Whether the responses are sympathy, hostility, or technical doesn't matter because all you're interested in is getting some attention, whether negative, positive, or informative. Every single one of your postings have begun with a personal insult, either to an individual or to the group, which seems more appropriate to starting a bar room fight than a technical discussion. You don't care about ham radio antennas because I suspect you've never actually built or designed a working antenna. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_mentality https://healthpsychologyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/the-victim-personality/ What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? -- Rick |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
... On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. Whether the responses are sympathy, hostility, or technical doesn't matter because all you're interested in is getting some attention, whether negative, positive, or informative. Every single one of your postings have begun with a personal insult, either to an individual or to the group, which seems more appropriate to starting a bar room fight than a technical discussion. You don't care about ham radio antennas because I suspect you've never actually built or designed a working antenna. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_mentality https://healthpsychologyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/the-victim-personality/ Completely untrue and shame on you for promulgating the ill-feeling which I proscribed. However, you're right that I do not care for antennas, for it is antennae that interest me. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"rickman" wrote in message
... What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? Why on earth would you wish to ignore discussions that may go beyond the current limits of your understanding? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"gareth" wrote in
: "David Ryeburn" wrote in message ... In article , "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this Depends upon what you mean by "this". Three newsgroups appeared in the "Newsgroups:" header of your message, and will appear in the response I am now making. and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? I subscribe to rec.radio.amateur.antenna, not the other newsgroups. Until it got invaded by cross-posters from certain other groups, it USED to contain mostly things about ANTENNAS. It was fun to read back then. David, W8EZE 1949-1967 and VE7EZM + AF7BZ since 2013 Those of we who wish to discuss antennAE and related phenomena or noumena are not invaders. Skitt strikes again! |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
En el artículo , Jeff
Liebermann escribió: The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. Exactly so. Whether the responses are sympathy, hostility, or technical doesn't matter because all you're interested in is getting some attention Exactly so. , whether negative, positive, or informative. Every single one of your postings have begun with a personal insult Exactly so. , either to an individual or to the group, which seems more appropriate to starting a bar room fight Exactly so. than a technical discussion. You don't care about ham radio antennas because I suspect you've never actually built or designed a working antenna. Exactly so. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_mentality https://healthpsychologyconsultancy....26/the-victim- personality/ You've summed up the uk.radio.amateur resident troll to a T. Follow-ups set appropriately (but watch Evans unset them to feed his need for attention.) -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
En el artículo , rickman
escribió: What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? Maybe you could take your own advice. -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/15/2015 2:05 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
En el artículo , rickman escribió: What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? Maybe you could take your own advice. The posts I have been exchanging with Gareth have been civil and technical, on both our parts. He did stop responding which is something few of the argumentative posters have been able to achieve. :P -- Rick |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"rickman" wrote in message
... On 9/15/2015 2:05 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: En el artículo , rickman escribió: What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? Maybe you could take your own advice. The posts I have been exchanging with Gareth have been civil and technical, on both our parts. He did stop responding which is something few of the argumentative posters have been able to achieve. I stopped responding because IMHO you were repeating matters aready discussed (and disagreed) |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? YES! As soon as someone responds to one of Gareth's posts the fun begins. He starts a troll with an innocent question and then goads the responders on and one. THE BEST SOLUTION IS TO TOTALLY IGNORE HIM AND HIS POSTS. MY 2 CENTS WORTH! Irv VE6BP |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Irv Finkleman" wrote in message
... What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? YES! As soon as someone responds to one of Gareth's posts the fun begins. He starts a troll with an innocent question and then goads the responders on and one. THE BEST SOLUTION IS TO TOTALLY IGNORE HIM AND HIS POSTS. MY 2 CENTS WORTH! That is completely untrue and I challenge you to put your money where your mouth is and produce such a goad, for there are none whatsoever. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... If you 'blank' him he throws a tantrum for a while but, if you just ignore it, he eventually crawls away in a sulk. He comes back and you need to repeat the process but it is worth it. I have neither sulked, nor thrown a tantrum, unlilke you who now has picked up the moniker from Cum as The Serial Question Avoider. Once again, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, I ask you why every post of yours is an abusive jibe and never relevant to the gentlemanly and technical traditions of amateur radio? Why do you behave like that? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
Brian Reay wrote:
rickman wrote: On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. So why are you enabling? Whether the responses are sympathy, hostility, or technical doesn't matter because all you're interested in is getting some attention, whether negative, positive, or informative. Every single one of your postings have begun with a personal insult, either to an individual or to the group, which seems more appropriate to starting a bar room fight than a technical discussion. You don't care about ham radio antennas because I suspect you've never actually built or designed a working antenna. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victim_mentality https://healthpsychologyconsultancy.wordpress.com/2012/10/26/the-victim-personality/ What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? Yes. If you 'blank' him he throws a tantrum for a while but, if you just ignore it, he eventually crawls away in a sulk. He comes back and you need to repeat the process but it is worth it. Do you remember how badly he lost his mind during Project Shun? He positively soiled himself on a daily basis, so angry and upset he was at being denied the attention he craves. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/15/2015 2:55 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
He is a troll, pure and simple, and has been at it since 1997. I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him rather than simply discuss. Most of those who argue with him are actually being trolls themselves, not unlike a group gathering around a fight cheering it on, being part of the reason to fight in the first place. -- Rick |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/15/2015 4:11 PM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message ... On 9/15/2015 2:05 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: En el artículo , rickman escribió: What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? Maybe you could take your own advice. The posts I have been exchanging with Gareth have been civil and technical, on both our parts. He did stop responding which is something few of the argumentative posters have been able to achieve. I stopped responding because IMHO you were repeating matters aready discussed (and disagreed) Disagreed with perhaps, but not successfully argued against. -- Rick |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
En el artículo , rickman
escribió: I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him I never respond directly to him; the malicious old fool is in my killfile. My posts are intended to inform others about his character, history and motives, especially as he wrote to my employer insinuating I was a paedophile in an attempt to have me sacked. He failed miserably, by the way; they saw straight through his poison pen email for what it was and laughed it off. He's done a similar thing on several previous occasions, one of which earned him a fine and a criminal conviction in court in October 2011 for sending a malicious communication. I agree with other posters who say the best tactic is simply not to rise to his bait, because that is all he is doing: trolling to get a reaction. He's well known within the amateur radio community (for which he laughably propounds to be an ambassador) for his activities on Usenet. https://cqhq.wordpress.com/2011/10/2...ge-times-four/ http://www.laughingpoliceman.com/court_amateurs.htm -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... That describes him pretty well. He has a 'stock' of topics he recycles questions on, although he has been forced to add to it recently as people have started to ignore him. Likewise, he has a stock of standard insults, some of which at really quite vile. Plus, if someone stands up to him, he has contacted employers in the past with malicious, false, allegations- he was successfully prosecuted after doing this several years ago. Unfortunately, he has a few misguided supporters in uk.radio.amateur (who are little better than him). As for dealing with him, just ignore him. He will rant for a bit and then go off and sulk. He will return, and the cycle will repeat. By his own admission he is a 'slow learner' but he will eventually get the message. Once again, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, your post is a tirade of false, confabulated, abusive rants that has nothing to do with the gentlemanly and technical traditions of amateur radio Why do you behave like that? It takes all sorts to make up the cadre of radio amateurs, and a concerted hate campaign of personal remarks against one person with whom you disagree really is out of place. So, why do you behave like that? As to "a stock of standard insults", perhaps you would put your money where your mouth is and give examples of where I have been the originator of abusive exchanges? No? Strange that. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"rickman" wrote in message
... On 9/15/2015 2:55 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: He is a troll, pure and simple, and has been at it since 1997. I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him rather than simply discuss. Most of those who argue with him are actually being trolls themselves, not unlike a group gathering around a fight cheering it on, being part of the reason to fight in the first place. And now, by resorting to personal attacks, you yourself become the troll In the 21 years since 1994 that I have been a subscriber to amateur radio NGs, there has been neither any trolls, nor the origination of personal attacks by me. (I see that Tomlinson's one-sided mentally-unhealthy obsession continues in the back ground. As evidence of such, has Tomlinson offered any techncial input to the discussions?) |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"rickman" wrote in message
... Disagreed with perhaps, but not successfully argued against. Thank-you for your sincere admission of defeat. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Stephen Thomas Cole wrote: Do you remember how badly he lost his mind during Project Shun? He positively soiled himself on a daily basis, so angry and upset he was at being denied the attention he craves. Exactly, which is why it should be repeated. I do not crave attention, and neither have I been angry or upset, but only bemused by the pair of you who spend all your time on Usenet seeking attention for yourselves by venting your spleens. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"gareth" wrote in message
... "Irv Finkleman" wrote in message ... What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? YES! As soon as someone responds to one of Gareth's posts the fun begins. He starts a troll with an innocent question and then goads the responders on and one. THE BEST SOLUTION IS TO TOTALLY IGNORE HIM AND HIS POSTS. MY 2 CENTS WORTH! That is completely untrue and I challenge you to put your money where your mouth is and produce such a goad, for there are none whatsoever. Irv? Hullo? Are you there, OM? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Unfortunately, he has a few misguided supporters in uk.radio.amateur (who are little better than him). Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, that you are bitter about and pick fault with so many other posters to the NGs, is it not perhaps indicative that if a problem exists, that that problem s closer to your own front gate? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"gareth" wrote in message
... As to "a stock of standard insults", perhaps you would put your money where your mouth is and give examples of where I have been the originator of abusive exchanges? Hullo? Brian? Are you there? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:08:01 +0100, gareth wrote:
Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, that you are bitter about and pick fault with so many other posters to the NGs, is it not perhaps indicative that if a problem exists, that that problem s closer to your own front gate? Oh, the irony. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/16/2015 5:10 AM, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message ... On 9/15/2015 2:55 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: He is a troll, pure and simple, and has been at it since 1997. I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him rather than simply discuss. Most of those who argue with him are actually being trolls themselves, not unlike a group gathering around a fight cheering it on, being part of the reason to fight in the first place. And now, by resorting to personal attacks, you yourself become the troll In the 21 years since 1994 that I have been a subscriber to amateur radio NGs, there has been neither any trolls, nor the origination of personal attacks by me. ROFLMAO! That's the funniest line I've heard this entire year! But then delusional people actually believe things like this. snip -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry ================== |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:09:15 +0100, Jerry Stuckle
wrote: On 9/16/2015 5:10 AM, gareth wrote: "rickman" wrote in message ... On 9/15/2015 2:55 PM, Mike Tomlinson wrote: He is a troll, pure and simple, and has been at it since 1997. I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only because others argue with him rather than simply discuss. Most of those who argue with him are actually being trolls themselves, not unlike a group gathering around a fight cheering it on, being part of the reason to fight in the first place. And now, by resorting to personal attacks, you yourself become the troll In the 21 years since 1994 that I have been a subscriber to amateur radio NGs, there has been neither any trolls, nor the origination of personal attacks by me. ROFLMAO! That's the funniest line I've heard this entire year! But then delusional people actually believe things like this. snip Oh dear, the loons are out again. -- Bah, and indeed, Humbug |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:38:59 -0400, rickman wrote:
On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. So why are you enabling? Frustration. You may have missed what rec.radio.amateur.antenna was like before he arrived. There were a fair collection of very knowledgeable experts present, that were able to answer most questions. There were also very interesting discussions, on such things as fractal antennas and modeling. I was involved with several people reverse engineering an MFJ-1800 antenna. I won't claim to be anywhere near as knowledgeable as these people. I read, I learned, I tried to answer a few questions, and I made a fool of myself displaying my ignorance in a few areas. Today, these people are gone or hiding. Nothing of any technical interest has appeared for many months. We are now blessed with discussions of quantum physics, which have no relevance to antenna design. We are deluged with stupid questions by Gareth which rapidly morph into discussions about the details of Gareth's perceived persecutions. I have yet to see any calculations or real antennas. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!activity/rec.radio.amateur.antenna/xnXlqNH1MAAJ I just hate to see graffiti on a wall, garbage in the streets, and Gareth in this newsgroup. Staying quiet hasn't worked, so I decided it was worth one last try, which apparently has failed. Yes, I became part of the problem, but I think it was worth the risk. Too bad it didn't work. I'm not sure what to next. I'll probably just resort to selectively reading posts by those that I know are knowledgeable and have something to offer. I also have a real live genuine antenna problem that I can't solve. I'm not ready to post it yet, but soon. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? I don't know. Neither shoving a mirror in his face or ignoring him seems to be working. My current solution is to simply add a filter to Forte Agent newsreader, that reduces the number of acceptable cross posted newsgroups from my current 3 to 1 for this group. Since Gareth likes a large and unwilling audience for dramas, that should drop any threads he originates. http://www.forteinc.com/agent/faq.php#BAF8BFCB74FE9B17852571C0000D3065 No follow ups please. It's not worth the effort. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On 9/16/2015 1:27 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:38:59 -0400, rickman wrote: On 9/15/2015 1:21 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 13:19:32 +0100, "gareth" wrote: Is it the purpose of this and other NGs merely to act as a forum for the congenitally abusive duet from that corner of Kent to vent their spleens in a crescendo of ever-increasing attention-seeking bile? The purpose of the three cross posted newsgroups are to act as a stage for you to act out your victim drama. So why are you enabling? Frustration. You may have missed what rec.radio.amateur.antenna was like before he arrived. There were a fair collection of very knowledgeable experts present, that were able to answer most questions. There were also very interesting discussions, on such things as fractal antennas and modeling. I was involved with several people reverse engineering an MFJ-1800 antenna. I won't claim to be anywhere near as knowledgeable as these people. I read, I learned, I tried to answer a few questions, and I made a fool of myself displaying my ignorance in a few areas. Today, these people are gone or hiding. Nothing of any technical interest has appeared for many months. We are now blessed with discussions of quantum physics, which have no relevance to antenna design. We are deluged with stupid questions by Gareth which rapidly morph into discussions about the details of Gareth's perceived persecutions. I have yet to see any calculations or real antennas. https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!activity/rec.radio.amateur.antenna/xnXlqNH1MAAJ I just hate to see graffiti on a wall, garbage in the streets, and Gareth in this newsgroup. Staying quiet hasn't worked, so I decided it was worth one last try, which apparently has failed. Yes, I became part of the problem, but I think it was worth the risk. Too bad it didn't work. I'm not sure what to next. I'll probably just resort to selectively reading posts by those that I know are knowledgeable and have something to offer. I also have a real live genuine antenna problem that I can't solve. I'm not ready to post it yet, but soon. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore him... no? I don't know. Neither shoving a mirror in his face or ignoring him seems to be working. My current solution is to simply add a filter to Forte Agent newsreader, that reduces the number of acceptable cross posted newsgroups from my current 3 to 1 for this group. Since Gareth likes a large and unwilling audience for dramas, that should drop any threads he originates. http://www.forteinc.com/agent/faq.php#BAF8BFCB74FE9B17852571C0000D3065 No follow ups please. It's not worth the effort. Too long, didn't read... -- Rick |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
Can I suggest people remove the moderation group when responding to
this thread. One of Evans' ploys is to crosspost to unrelated groups to spread his poison. No point in helping him. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Indeed, he seems to have been screaming for attention all day. No doubt he will continue this evening. Is it any wonder his vapourware projects never progress and he never actually seems to improve his knowledge, beyond learning a few 'buzz words' to initiate his goading threads. Such negative displacement activity probably accounts for his failures. Once again, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, the sole purpose of your post is to vent your spleen in a personal attack; an attack that is confabulated and false and that has nothing to do with amateur radio or to these NGs. Why do you continue to behave in that manner that all grown-ups left behind in the kindergarten school? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
... There were also very interesting discussions, on such things as fractal antennas and modeling. Once again your post is a thinly-disguised vehicle for an infantile personal attack, and shame on you for that. However, in the light of your comment above that I have quoted, why do you not find the discussions to be of interest that I introduce for two reasons, firstly because the points interest me , and secondly to enliven an almost-dead group? I never originate any abusive remarks in the manner that you exhibit. |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Can I suggest people remove the moderation group when responding to this thread. One of Evans' ploys is to crosspost to unrelated groups to spread his poison. No point in helping him. Once again, Brian, M3OSN, Old Chum, your post is nobbut a vehicle for you to vent your spleen in confabulated and false personal attacks. Why do you behave like that, in the manner of a 5-year-old in the kindergarten playground? Perhaps you failed to notice that my OP in this thread was very much to criticise you in person for the very reason that you illustrate above? Have you nothing of relevance to these NG to contribute? |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:25 -0400, rickman wrote:
Too long, didn't read... "Sorry, but I didn't have time to make it shorter." (Blaise Pascal, Mark Twain, and others). "Nothing of importance has ever been said on one line" (Me) -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
What is the purpose of this and other NGs?
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:51:25 -0400, rickman wrote: Too long, didn't read... "Sorry, but I didn't have time to make it shorter." (Blaise Pascal, Mark Twain, and others). "Nothing of importance has ever been said on one line" (Me) "The drinks are on the house." -- Jim Pennino |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:36 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com