En el artículo , rickman
escribió:

I won't argue that point one bit. But it is an effective troll only
because others argue with him

I never respond directly to him; the malicious old fool is in my
killfile. My posts are intended to inform others about his character,
history and motives, especially as he wrote to my employer insinuating I
was a paedophile in an attempt to have me sacked. He failed miserably,
by the way; they saw straight through his poison pen email for what it
was and laughed it off.

He's done a similar thing on several previous occasions, one of which
earned him a fine and a criminal conviction in court in October 2011 for
sending a malicious communication.

I agree with other posters who say the best tactic is simply not to rise
to his bait, because that is all he is doing: trolling to get a
reaction.

He's well known within the amateur radio community (for which he
laughably propounds to be an ambassador) for his activities on Usenet.

https://cqhq.wordpress.com/2011/10/2...ge-times-four/

http://www.laughingpoliceman.com/court_amateurs.htm

--
(\_/)
(='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke!
(")_(")