RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   The non-existent RF photons (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/220033-non-existent-rf-photons.html)

gareth September 16th 15 12:23 PM

The non-existent RF photons
 
It still remains that all of the RF Photonists who post here are
quite incapable of presenting an informed discussion about the
characteristics of their RF photons, which thereby must be noumena
and not phenomena.

It still remains that the RF Photonists who insist that their photons
have no physical start and no physical end cannot explain that
when I receive the Morse / Vail letter E, that I hear nothing before the
arrival of their photon(s) and then nothing thereafter?




Stephen Thomas Cole[_3_] September 16th 15 02:42 PM

The non-existent RF photons
 
"gareth" wrote:
It still remains that all of the RF Photonists who post here are
quite incapable of presenting an informed discussion about the
characteristics of their RF photons, which thereby must be noumena
and not phenomena.

It still remains that the RF Photonists who insist that their photons
have no physical start and no physical end cannot explain that
when I receive the Morse / Vail letter E, that I hear nothing before the
arrival of their photon(s) and then nothing thereafter?


YFI.

--
STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur

Jerry Stuckle September 16th 15 03:17 PM

The non-existent RF photons
 
On 9/16/2015 7:23 AM, gareth wrote:
It still remains that all of the RF Photonists who post here are
quite incapable of presenting an informed discussion about the
characteristics of their RF photons, which thereby must be noumena
and not phenomena.

It still remains that the RF Photonists who insist that their photons
have no physical start and no physical end cannot explain that
when I receive the Morse / Vail letter E, that I hear nothing before the
arrival of their photon(s) and then nothing thereafter?




Wrong. This was explained to you. But you're too dense to understand
any explanation containing words of more than one syllable or four letters.

But the fact you even ask the question shows you have absolutely no
understanding of wave propagation. Even a six-year-old with a ham
license can answer your question.

Let me ask you this. When you are walking down the street and a car
passes you. Does the car get created when you first see it, and
destroyed when it goes out of sight?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

rickman September 16th 15 04:14 PM

The non-existent RF photons
 
On 9/16/2015 10:17 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/16/2015 7:23 AM, gareth wrote:
It still remains that all of the RF Photonists who post here are
quite incapable of presenting an informed discussion about the
characteristics of their RF photons, which thereby must be noumena
and not phenomena.

It still remains that the RF Photonists who insist that their photons
have no physical start and no physical end cannot explain that
when I receive the Morse / Vail letter E, that I hear nothing before the
arrival of their photon(s) and then nothing thereafter?




Wrong. This was explained to you. But you're too dense to understand
any explanation containing words of more than one syllable or four letters.

But the fact you even ask the question shows you have absolutely no
understanding of wave propagation. Even a six-year-old with a ham
license can answer your question.

Let me ask you this. When you are walking down the street and a car
passes you. Does the car get created when you first see it, and
destroyed when it goes out of sight?


Is that a near-field car or a far-field car?

--

Rick

Jerry Stuckle September 16th 15 04:31 PM

The non-existent RF photons
 
On 9/16/2015 11:14 AM, rickman wrote:
On 9/16/2015 10:17 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/16/2015 7:23 AM, gareth wrote:
It still remains that all of the RF Photonists who post here are
quite incapable of presenting an informed discussion about the
characteristics of their RF photons, which thereby must be noumena
and not phenomena.

It still remains that the RF Photonists who insist that their photons
have no physical start and no physical end cannot explain that
when I receive the Morse / Vail letter E, that I hear nothing before
the
arrival of their photon(s) and then nothing thereafter?




Wrong. This was explained to you. But you're too dense to understand
any explanation containing words of more than one syllable or four
letters.

But the fact you even ask the question shows you have absolutely no
understanding of wave propagation. Even a six-year-old with a ham
license can answer your question.

Let me ask you this. When you are walking down the street and a car
passes you. Does the car get created when you first see it, and
destroyed when it goes out of sight?


Is that a near-field car or a far-field car?


Yes.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

[email protected] September 16th 15 06:52 PM

The non-existent RF photons
 
gareth wrote:
It still remains that all of the RF Photonists who post here are
quite incapable of presenting an informed discussion about the
characteristics of their RF photons, which thereby must be noumena
and not phenomena.

It still remains that the RF Photonists who insist that their photons
have no physical start and no physical end cannot explain that
when I receive the Morse / Vail letter E, that I hear nothing before the
arrival of their photon(s) and then nothing thereafter?


You have already been pointed to all the answers but your refuse to
study them and read the 110 references.

Perhaps you would like to discuss why anyone should type in page after
page of text when you could simply click on a link?



--
Jim Pennino


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com