Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 21st 04, 12:53 PM
Fractenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I am not certain I understand your answer- or Chip's.
The original poster made the statement that mesh parabolas are only 80% as
efficient as a solid parabola. That was what I was answering.


The wok's inefficiencies stem from the fact that it is not a true paraboloid.

73,
Chip N1IR
  #12   Report Post  
Old August 21st 04, 02:37 PM
Ian White, G3SEK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fractenna wrote:
As Dale says, Arecibo uses a spherical reflector to allow a few degrees
of beam steering by pointing the feed antenna at different areas of the
dish. However, this is a very special case: the only practical way to
achieve a 1000ft dish was to build it immovably on the ground, so the
designers then had to find some other way to steer the beam, by moving
the feed antenna at the focus. In this one special case, the optimum
shape for the reflector is not a paraboloid but a sphere (because the
geometry of a sphere is the same in any direction, as seem from the
feedpoint at the centre).


Basically correct. Although the tracking is better than just a few
degrees:-)

Thanks for the correction - I hadn't realised it can steer up to 40 deg.
A Google search for "arecibo feed" produced that information, and much
more.

Nice pictures of the 43MHz feed at:
http://tinyurl.com/64cp9
and
http://tinyurl.com/69sa3
Against the dish itself, it's easy to lose your sense of scale - that
little thing is 90ft tall.


Arecibo was initially designed to be a survellance instrument,
passively listening to Soviet communications through inadvertant
moonbounce. It also was designed, initially, as an ionospheric heating
facility.

Through the huge luck of its overengineering, it was found to be able
to track quite accurately, and the feeds and carriage houses were
designed to accommodate a greater tracking range.


The official history (http://tinyurl.com/46zfd) is less forthcoming
about the original intentions, but there's an interesting "40 years ago"
article at
http://www.elecdesign.com/Articles/A...3700/3700.html



--
73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB)
http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek
  #13   Report Post  
Old August 21st 04, 03:57 PM
Fractenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The official history (http://tinyurl.com/46zfd) is less forthcoming
about the original intentions


Correct.

73,
Chip N1IR
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Mobile Ant L match ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 14 January 20th 04 04:08 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017