| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let's try to summarise, and sort out some of the confusion: * As Dale says, a mesh reflector is almost as efficient as a solid surface of the same shape, even for hole sizes as large as 0.1wl. * That was a side-track anyway, since the OP doesn't have a mesh wok. * Any vaguely bowl-shaped reflector - including a wok - will make a big improvement in cellphone performance, if you locate the cellphone at the best possible place, line the whole thing up correctly, and manage to keep your head out of the way. * A paraboloid is the best shape for a reflector, because only a paraboloid can focus all the incoming rays to a single point; and all the incoming energy from a plane wavefront will arrive in-phase at the focal point. This applies equally to light and radio waves. Optical ray-tracing theory breaks down if the reflector is only a few wavelengths in diameter, but a paraboloid is still the best practical shape to aim for. As Dale says, Arecibo uses a spherical reflector to allow a few degrees of beam steering by pointing the feed antenna at different areas of the dish. However, this is a very special case: the only practical way to achieve a 1000ft dish was to build it immovably on the ground, so the designers then had to find some other way to steer the beam, by moving the feed antenna at the focus. In this one special case, the optimum shape for the reflector is not a paraboloid but a sphere (because the geometry of a sphere is the same in any direction, as seem from the feedpoint at the centre). Basically correct. Although the tracking is better than just a few degrees:-) Arecibo was initially designed to be a survellance instrument, passively listening to Soviet communications through inadvertant moonbounce. It also was designed, initially, as an ionospheric heating facility. Through the huge luck of its overengineering, it was found to be able to track quite accurately, and the feeds and carriage houses were designed to accommodate a greater tracking range. Today the site no longer has chicken wire (and hasn't for 30 years); and the feeds are Gregorians that accommodate very large bandwidths and spectral ranges. Most of the recent upgrades were funded by the NSF, and also the Seti Institute. 73, Chip N1IR |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||