| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the purposes of radio signals, does the shape need to be a specific
paraboloid? Certainly at optical wavelengths a parabola is needed to focus light from infinity, so a parabola is needed. But at radio Frequency wavelengths a true parabola is not likely needed. In fact, considering the difference between a sphere and a parabols, I would suspect that anything out there is not a true parabola unless it is arrived at by chance. - Mike KB3EIA - No; but optimum aperture efficiency is attained with a point feed, as you get with a true paraboloid. Spheres work too--if you can make a good line feed. If you are willing to throw a few dB away, and don't care about the sidelobes and shape of the main beam to any great degree, then all kinds of imperfections from paraboloids work well. Of course, a pringle can also works at 2.4...so there are many options. 73, Chip N1IR |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||