Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/12/2015 4:45 PM, joe wrote:
gareth wrote: The forward and reflected waves in transmission lines and antennae do not affect each other by the principle of superposition (although they act together to give an apparent (and only apparent) standing wave. Please allow me the liberty of rephrasing your sentence as follows: The forward and reflected waves in transmission lines and antennae do not affect each other. However, by the principle of superposition they act together to produce a standing wave. (Superposition is the adding together of two or more stimuli to produce one response.) Why, then, should a transducer connected to one end of a transmisison line (such as the PA stage of a TX) be affected by the apparent VSWR, as we know that it is, but why does not the principle of superposition apply in this case? You have energy travelling toward the PA (the eflected wave. It has to be dissipated. That adds heat to the PA. No, it does not have to be dissipated. Most of it is reflected back toward the antenna by the transmitter's output network. There may be some dissipation at the transmitter, but that is due to losses in the network. Just curious. (The enquiring mind - the mark of the _REAL_ Radio Ham) You really should try to use google and look things up that interest you rather than try to initiate discussions for the sake of discussing something. You really should learn to understand and use the Smith chart. I know, it has a bit of a learning curve associated with it for the uninitiated, but you could greatly benefit from studying it. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Superposition of waves? | Antenna | |||
blah, blah, blah... was Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, superposition, etc. | Antenna | |||
Superposition | Antenna | |||
Is the Superposition Principle invalid? | Antenna |