|
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
Amateur radio is primarily a technical pursuit with operating, if done at
all, coming in second-to-last. Those who operate only and who do not understand anything about the internals of their rigs, and even get someone else to mend them should they go wrong are indistinguishable from CBers. Those who really were dedicatd to the pursuit of amateur radio exerted themselves to pass the 12WPM Morse Test even if they had no interest in Morse. Amateur radio is a pursuit for grown ups and not for children, except when a child has expressed interest, but without being pressured to up the political reputation of its parent, then they can be encouraged. The three-tier-farce of the RSCB is just that, a farce, because anybody with the right mental attitude and interest would by their very interest teach themselves to the level of the RAE. Therefore, any grown man taking out an M3 or M6 licence is a loser and a failure In the current PC climate, those who go out of their way to encourage children to join in should cause eyebrows to be raised. Those who cannot contribute to discussion here without the use of nasty spiteful personal remarks are Childish Broadcasting (CB) losers, and prove themselves to be losers and failures with every post that they exude. The truth of what I say above will now be proven in the subsequent thread by those very losers and failures. Antennae, propagation and launching into propagation from short antennae are worthy subjects that do not need the sneering of losers anf failures. |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
"gareth" wrote:
Amateur radio is primarily a technical pursuit with operating, if done at all, coming in second-to-last. Those who operate only and who do not understand anything about the internals of their rigs, and even get someone else to mend them should they go wrong are indistinguishable from CBers. Those who really were dedicatd to the pursuit of amateur radio exerted themselves to pass the 12WPM Morse Test even if they had no interest in Morse. Amateur radio is a pursuit for grown ups and not for children, except when a child has expressed interest, but without being pressured to up the political reputation of its parent, then they can be encouraged. The three-tier-farce of the RSCB is just that, a farce, because anybody with the right mental attitude and interest would by their very interest teach themselves to the level of the RAE. Therefore, any grown man taking out an M3 or M6 licence is a loser and a failure In the current PC climate, those who go out of their way to encourage children to join in should cause eyebrows to be raised. Those who cannot contribute to discussion here without the use of nasty spiteful personal remarks are Childish Broadcasting (CB) losers, and prove themselves to be losers and failures with every post that they exude. The truth of what I say above will now be proven in the subsequent thread by those very losers and failures. Antennae, propagation and launching into propagation from short antennae are worthy subjects that do not need the sneering of losers anf failures. Well done, OM. Only two spelling mistakes in that post! That must be a new record for you? -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
En el artículo , Stephen Thomas
Cole escribió: Well done, OM. Only two spelling mistakes in that post! That must be a new record for you? Must have been before he started on the meths. -- (\_/) (='.'=) Bunny says: Windows 10? Nein danke! (")_(") |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
Amateur radio is primarily a technical pursuit with operating, if done at all, coming in second-to-last. If one doesn't operate, one doesn't need a license. Those who operate only and who do not understand anything about the internals of their rigs, and even get someone else to mend them should they go wrong are indistinguishable from CBers. Or military radio operators. Those who really were dedicatd to the pursuit of amateur radio exerted themselves to pass the 12WPM Morse Test even if they had no interest in Morse. So since the elimination of code tests no one is dedicated. Amateur radio is a pursuit for grown ups and not for children, except when a child has expressed interest, but without being pressured to up the political reputation of its parent, then they can be encouraged. Why? You said "Amateur radio is primarily a technical pursuit" and is someone, no matter their age, show the technical aptitude, why shouldn't they has an amateur license? The three-tier-farce of the RSCB is just that, a farce, because anybody with the right mental attitude and interest would by their very interest teach themselves to the level of the RAE. As the RSCB (whatever that is) is irrelevant outside the UK, no comment. Therefore, any grown man taking out an M3 or M6 licence is a loser and a failure How about a grown woman? In the current PC climate, those who go out of their way to encourage children to join in should cause eyebrows to be raised. Especially when the encouragement includes ass patting. Those who cannot contribute to discussion here without the use of nasty spiteful personal remarks are Childish Broadcasting (CB) losers, and prove themselves to be losers and failures with every post that they exude. And who have been hauled into court over their actions. The truth of what I say above will now be proven in the subsequent thread by those very losers and failures. You are going to respond to yourself again? Antennae, propagation and launching into propagation from short antennae are worthy subjects that do not need the sneering of losers anf failures. Propagation is due to conditions of the Earth's atmosphere and the presence of the Earth itself. Antennas are conductive structures that convert AC current flow into electromagnetic radiation. There is much more to antenna theory than "short antennae" (sic). -- Jim Pennino |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and maliciouswhen you do?
|
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Michael Black wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, wrote: In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote: Amateur radio is primarily a technical pursuit with operating, if done at all, coming in second-to-last. If one doesn't operate, one doesn't need a license. Then you'll never be able to test those exotic transmitters you build. Sure you can, just not connected to an antenna. My ham license gives me something that no other radio service allows, the ability to build the transmitting equipment, and try new things. There is no more flexible a radio service than ham radio. Everyone else is channelized, limited to some specific use in some specific band, with limitations on mode and maybe even operating time. Amateur radio allows multiple modes (and trying new modes), just about anywhere in a given band, with bands over the full spectrum (yes, even now back below the AM braodcast band), using just about any kind of antenna and often power not allowed some radio services. Michael Yep. It is a little difficult to understand gareth's position that operating is of little importance. In the US, one of the purposes of the amateur radio license is "providing the nation with a pool of trained radio operators and technicians who can provide essential communications during emergencies." http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/services/amateur.html I can find nothing from the FCC concerning babbling on about "short antennae" ad nauseam. -- Jim Pennino |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and maliciouswhen you do?
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 6:06:49 AM UTC-6, gareth wrote:
Antennae, propagation and launching into propagation from short antennae are worthy subjects that do not need the sneering of losers anf failures. While approaching the mix master, the controller pressed the lever. This caused mayhem to spew forth in a disorderly non military manner. When consulted about this abuse, the controller cried mightily that all within his range should discover a severe case of resistance. Otherwise they are not Real® sailors, but merely Sears sailors who obviously have no business even being in a boat, much less controlling one. |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1601131637580.18589@darkstar. example.org... On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, wrote: In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote: Amateur radio is primarily a technical pursuit with operating, if done at all, coming in second-to-last. If one doesn't operate, one doesn't need a license. Then you'll never be able to test those exotic transmitters you build. My ham license gives me something that no other radio service allows, the ability to build the transmitting equipment, and try new things. There is no more flexible a radio service than ham radio. Everyone else is channelized, limited to some specific use in some specific band, with limitations on mode and maybe even operating time. Amateur radio allows multiple modes (and trying new modes), just about anywhere in a given band, with bands over the full spectrum (yes, even now back below the AM braodcast band), using just about any kind of antenna and often power not allowed some radio services. +1 |
You might well disagree, but why be so childish and malicious when you do?
"gareth" wrote in message
... Those who cannot contribute to discussion here without the use of nasty spiteful personal remarks are Childish Broadcasting (CB) losers, and prove themselves to be losers and failures with every post that they exude. The truth of what I say above will now be proven in the subsequent thread by those very losers and failures. Proven words in both NGs, especially from those in the Canary Islands and in their second childhood in Yankland? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com