Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Jerry Martes" wrote in message news:8ZPWc.2585$9P.466@trnddc04... It may not be an answer to your question, but, 4 lengths of 75 ohm coax connected in series and parallel would result in 75 ohms, balanced. Two 50 ohm coax cables "paralleled" could provide 100 ohms balanced with the center conductors used as the balanced line. Jerry I posted the same answer in his 'found' thread - but I wasn't sure if my memory was in correct operating order. At least your post gives me hope that my memory hasn't completely left me. :-) I've used that scheme to make matching sections a few years back. 75-ohm cable comes in handy a lot of times. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 7/30/2004 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Hal Yeah, the idea does work. I am using two 'side by side' RG223s right now to evaluate a dipole antenna I'm playing with. For my purpose, the 70 ohm dipole on the 100 ohm line is a good enough match. Jerry "Hal Rosser" wrote in message ... "Jerry Martes" wrote in message news:8ZPWc.2585$9P.466@trnddc04... It may not be an answer to your question, but, 4 lengths of 75 ohm coax connected in series and parallel would result in 75 ohms, balanced. Two 50 ohm coax cables "paralleled" could provide 100 ohms balanced with the center conductors used as the balanced line. Jerry I posted the same answer in his 'found' thread - but I wasn't sure if my memory was in correct operating order. At least your post gives me hope that my memory hasn't completely left me. :-) I've used that scheme to make matching sections a few years back. 75-ohm cable comes in handy a lot of times. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 7/30/2004 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Hal
Yeah, the idea does work. I am using two 'side by side' RG223s right now to evaluate a dipole antenna I'm playing with. For my purpose, the 70 ohm dipole on the 100 ohm line is a good enough match. Jerry and as Roy pointed out in the other thread - the assembly will just facilitate the transmission of a balanced load - not 'cause it' to be balanced - But as you pointed out - using such an assembly aids in impedence matching schemes - and if the line happens to be balanced - it won't tip over . ;-) --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 7/29/2004 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Hal Rosser" wrote in message . .. Hal Yeah, the idea does work. I am using two 'side by side' RG223s right now to evaluate a dipole antenna I'm playing with. For my purpose, the 70 ohm dipole on the 100 ohm line is a good enough match. Jerry and as Roy pointed out in the other thread - the assembly will just facilitate the transmission of a balanced load - not 'cause it' to be balanced - But as you pointed out - using such an assembly aids in impedence matching schemes - and if the line happens to be balanced - it won't tip over . ;-) And -- Use of a balanced line to feed a ballanced antenna allows a balun to be located where it may be of a lesser disturbance when it is not a perfect balun. Jerry |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ladder line construction methods? | Antenna | |||
Ladder line question ???? | Antenna | |||
Ladder Line or Coax For Reception only? | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |