| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"gareth" wrote in message ... Forgiving their ignorant use of the wrong plural, "antennas", this is a brilliant site, at first sight ... http://antenna-theory.com/ In particular, the following sub-page may teach the Yank rednecks who abuse this NG a thing or two ... http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/shortdipole.php Good references, but I see nothing new in the second reference with regard to short dipoles. If you can get 100 watts into a one foot long HF dipole, it will be just as efficient as a half wave dipole that also has 100 watts into it. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Antennae and the FT-450D | Antenna | |||
| Long antennae for LF and VLF? | Antenna | |||
| The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
| Top Band Antennae? | Antenna | |||
| Homemade Antennae, help | Antenna | |||