Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Fry" wrote in message ... "Wayne" wrote Dead on explanation. Some have insisted that inefficiencies result from antenna size and not from matching challenges. _______ Kindly note that the radiation efficiency of an antenna _system_ is related to its radiation resistance compared to other resistive losses present in that antenna system. It is possible to perfectly match the impedance at the feedpoint of an antenna system to the impedance of the transmission line connected there. But that antenna system still can have very poor radiation efficiency at that frequency. An example of this is a Z-matched, but electrically short vertical monopole driven against a poor r-f ground connection such as a few buried ground rods. Most of the available transmitter power is dissipated in the r-f ground resistance, rather than being usefully radiated as e-m waves. Duly noted, but the technical point I addressed was a bit different from the antenna system you describe. There has previously on the newsgroup been a claim that shortness makes inefficiency. To that I say that if for example, 100 watts is fed to a resonant HF dipole, and 100 watts is fed to a 1 foot long dipole, both radiate 100 watts. Different patterns, but the power radiated is the same, if you manage to successfully get the power to the antenna. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antennae and the FT-450D | Antenna | |||
Long antennae for LF and VLF? | Antenna | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Top Band Antennae? | Antenna | |||
Homemade Antennae, help | Antenna |