Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne" wrote:
"gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" wrote in message ... "Wayne" wrote in message ... There has previously on the newsgroup been a claim that shortness makes inefficiency. To that I say that if for example, 100 watts is fed to a resonant HF dipole, and 100 watts is fed to a 1 foot long dipole, both radiate 100 watts. Different patterns, but the power radiated is the same, if you manage to successfully get the power to the antenna. The ratio of radiation resistance to ohmic resistance will give the lie to your claim. In my claim, equal power arrives at the long or short antenna AFTER the ohmic resistances have already occurred. Doesn't matter if you need 2000 watts to deliver 100 watts to the short antenna. My understanding is that you claim the short antenna is inefficient only because it is short. Wayne, you're wasting your breath. You'll never get Gareth to see sense on this. He's been banging this drum for years now. -- STC // M0TEY // twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antennae and the FT-450D | Antenna | |||
Long antennae for LF and VLF? | Antenna | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Top Band Antennae? | Antenna | |||
Homemade Antennae, help | Antenna |