Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick C (rickman) clips:
I do not agree that your explanation holds water at all. The loopstick antenna will respond to a vertically polarized EM wave maximally when horizontal. That says nothing about whether it is responding to the E field or the H field. RESPONSE: Actually it does, because the maximum H field of a vertically-polarized, far-field, e-m wave always lies in the horizontal plane. So if the maximum r-f output of a loopstick receive antenna occurs when its axis lies in the horizontal plane, that output necessarily was produced by the H field. To determine that you need to generate a calibrated E field without the H field (or very low) and an H field with small E field (obviously only possible in the near field) and compare the results. RESPONSE: This was an assumption made by the developers of the E-H and Cross-field antennas --which was disproven in their field trials, as well as by theory. Neither the E field or the H field component of a far-field e-m wave can be produced or radiated independently. If one field exists, they both exist, and are related to the radiated power by the 377-ohm impedance of free space. RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Multi polarization antenna | Antenna | |||
Antenna Polarization Question | Antenna | |||
Patch antenna Polarization? | Antenna | |||
FYI - New AM {Medium Wave} DX Loop Antenna using Litz Wire plus Longwave LW Lowfer DX Loop Antenna | Shortwave | |||
What is the polarization of Inverted V ANTENNA | CB |