"Richard Clark" wrote message
...
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:36:14 -0500, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

So you are saying that sea water paths provide far better groundwave
propagation than overland paths because sea water a such a good
reflector?

RF

Hi OM,

What is the contention that is your point?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QH

__________________

That it isn't the reflective nature of sea water that is responsible for its
good propagation of groundwave signals. That is due to its conductivity.

RF

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:07:29 -0500, "Richard Fry"
wrote:
That it isn't the reflective nature of sea water that is responsible for its
good propagation of groundwave signals. That is due to its conductivity.

Hi OM,

Then the response is quite simple: you are wrong.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:07:29 -0500, "Richard Fry"
wrote:
That it isn't the reflective nature of sea water that is responsible for
its
good propagation of groundwave signals. That is due to its conductivity.

Hi OM,

Then the response is quite simple: you are wrong.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
__________

Believe as you wish, but you won't have much company...

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:20:32 -0500, "Richard Fry"
wrote:
Believe as you wish, but you won't have much company...

Hi OM,

Your reaction is the shock of a belief being challenged. ;-)

As for having company? I am not under the illusion that science is a
democracy, much less a madison avenue concept.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC