Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 5th 04, 12:33 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 17:04:49 GMT, Richard Clark wrote:

(and it is the molecular polarization and
relaxation moment that causes this, not conductivity)

On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 22:56:12 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

You all seem to have forgotten the very high permittivity of water. Does
this not affect reflectivity? A question for Cecil?


Ah Punchinello!

Clowning as ever, I see. A seque from the world's worst conductor to
the world's worst dielectric? This is the price of superlatives in
place of engineering specifics. Whatsamatta, did you defrock your
saint Kelvin?

What is the loss tangent of the mud in your garden Reggie? ;-)

Well, anticipating your typical loss for a response, and for others, a
nice round value of 1 is easily within rough accuracy. Corrections
(not speculations) are encouraged. Be specific.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017