Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And another example in point:
From the input to a TV transmit antenna system, tx disconnected, I have personally measured the far-end antenna system reflections of a 2T sin² video pulse (0.25 µs H.A.D.) modulated onto a TV channel carrier, and detected by a vestigial sideband demodulator tuned to that TV channel. A high-directivity directional coupler at the input to the main line, a display device, calibrated attenuators, and the time difference between the incident and reflected pulse enable accurate measurement of the reflection coefficient of the antenna system. This was a common practice after a new antenna system installation to measure and optimize the far-end match for the best quality radiated signal, and was pioneered by RCA Broadcast Eqpt Div, my employer at the time. More elegant means are used these days. When this test shows a 5% pulse return 2 µs after the incident pulse time (for example), then the same pulse passed through the tx also shows nearly exactly the same reflection % and time separation -- assuming there is enough RF delay in the system for the reflection to be resolved in the demodulated waveform. As the directional coupler driving the normal demodulator at the TV station is looking at forward power only, it is clear that the reflection from the far end of the antenna system has been re-reflected from the TV tx output stage, and NOT absorbed by it in its "conjugate impedance." RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR meter kaput? | Antenna | |||
Conjugate matching and my funky VSWR meter | Antenna | |||
10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |