Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 10:44:04 -0500, "Richard Fry" wrote:
snip When this test shows a 5% pulse return 2 µs after the incident pulse time (for example), then the same pulse passed through the tx also shows nearly exactly the same reflection % and time separation -- assuming there is enough RF delay in the system for the reflection to be resolved in the demodulated waveform. As the directional coupler driving the normal demodulator at the TV station is looking at forward power only, it is clear that the reflection from the far end of the antenna system has been re-reflected from the TV tx output stage, and NOT absorbed by it in its "conjugate impedance." RF Rich, I've got to tell you that you've just proved that the output circuitry of the tx doesn't absorb the reflection from the antenna, but instead, re-reflects it, because the output source resistance is not dissipative, only the cathode to plate resistance is dissipative. And the output source resistance is not dissipative or absorptive if the impedance match is 'conjugate'. Contrary to what Mendenhall said that the tx would absorb half the power if the source resistance is 50 ohms, there is nothing special about the conjugate relationship that would produce this effect. The tx will re-reflect whatever the match relationship is between the tx and its load. Walt |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR meter kaput? | Antenna | |||
Conjugate matching and my funky VSWR meter | Antenna | |||
10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |