LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26   Report Post  
Old September 7th 04, 10:46 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Harrison wrote:
Cecil, W5DXP wrote:
"Nope, they don`t have to be in-phase."

Cecil is right. The third side of a triangle can be longer or shorter
than one of the sides.

I should have said, it is entirely possible that the superposed forward
and reflected voltages can damage an unprotected transmitter, The
reflected voltage can add to the forward voltage applied to the
transmitter.

The phase of the reflected voltage should be out of phase with the
transmitter source voltage to maximize the volts across the internal
impedance of the transmitter if we want to damage an unprotected
transmitter.


Now assuming, as Richard H. logically did, that we don't want to damage
an unprotected transmitter, let's introduce the concept of an active
match Vs a passive match.

The match at the transmitter output is passive, not active. Consider
the following system:

XMTR---1/4WL 300 ohm feedline---1800 ohm load

What does it really mean when we say that the XMTR "sees" 50 ohms?

It means that an interference pattern is established at the XMTR
that re-reflects (re-directs) the reflected energy back toward the
load. The transmitter has absolutely nothing to do with that reflection.

We can reconfigure the system as follows:

XMTR---1WL 50 ohm feedline--+--1/4WL 300 ohm feedline---1800 ohm load

Now we can see that the match is passive and the XMTR has nothing to
do with the match.

Destructive interference on the XMTR side of '+' eliminates the reflections.
The resulting equal magnitude of constructive interference on the load side
of '+' re-reflects (re-directs) the reflected energy back toward the load.

Optics engineers understand interference. Seems RF engineers might not
fully understand interference. Interference is the cause of the
elimination of reflections in optic systems. Interference is the cause
of elimination of reflections in RF systems, including at antenna tuners.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SWR meter kaput? Thomas Antenna 5 August 13th 04 06:44 PM
Conjugate matching and my funky VSWR meter Lord Snooty Antenna 27 May 27th 04 08:44 PM
10 meter ant impedance at 15 meter PDRUNEN Antenna 5 March 31st 04 05:39 PM
Smith Chart Quiz Radio913 Antenna 315 October 21st 03 05:31 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017