| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Turner" wrote in message ... On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 00:02:26 GMT, "Dale Parfitt" wrote: This will be sad news to all the V/U weak signal ops who have consistantly covered long distances using horizontal polarity. __________________________________________________ _______ This fellow was planning to put his antenna on the roof of a car. Presumably he is *not* DXing. I was therefore speaking of groundwave coverage, not any kind of skip, and what I stated holds true; for local groundwave, vertical is best. DXers, on the other hand, use horizontal precisely because the local groundwave coverage is poor, thereby reducing local QRM but having little or no effect on skip signals. -- Bill, W6WRT QSLs via LoTW I wasn't talking about skip either- the majority of V/U weak signal work is extended ground wave via perhaps enhanced tropo. 1.Horizontal polarity can take advantage of ground gain reflection that vertical polarity cannot. 2. In addition, at 900 MHz where a wavelength is just over a foot, even mounting the antenna at 12" would place the first lobe at 15 degrees, assuming the car roof completely determines this- and I doubt that it has much of an effect on far field take off angle. Dale W4OP |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||