Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
"Fractenna" (Inventor) Bob's (W1XYZ) patents on this form a basis for ownership on such varieties of antennas, within the construct of the claims. That is my opinion. That's a hollow 'motherhood' statement - no one could disagree with that because your statement doesn't actually say anything (except to partially define the word 'patent'). Back to The Question: As you well know, a patent doesn't necessarily mean that anything functional has actually been built. This is self-evident by the numerous US patents for the impossible (or for the presently impossible). I was NOT asking about patents, I asked (quite clearly I might add) if anyone had actually built the subject item at the subject scale before the subject CNN news item. It is a very simple question. CNN story (they were first) true or false? ...the assignee of the patent is what's important. That assumes that there is any money to be made from it within the term. I believe that something like 99.99+% of all patents are money losing propositions. They're apparently a worse investment on average than lottery tickets. ...wouldn't hurt to give the man some well-deserved credit. Of course. The CNN story claimed that those people were first. All the RRAA 'harbour seals' starting barking that it was old news - most of them just didn't read the story carefully. Now W1XYZ drops by with his patent portfolio but didn't answer the very simple question - who actually made one first (which is where this long thread started). It is a very simple question. Not patents. Who made one first? CNN guys or W1XYZ or anyone else? So far - no one has provided anything to prove the CNN story was incorrect. Thanks for playing. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= *** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |