Richard Clark wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:44:02 -0700, "Chuck"
wrote:

Nonsense! I have made the assertion - and
I continue to do so - that minninec and NEC
based programs cannot model my design
simply from their inability to simulate a
virtual bi-directional coaxial phasing/delay line.

A "virtual bi-directional coaxial phasing/delay line."
That's a good one. Very inventive.


Either you're remarkably ignorant, or
you've made a failed attempt at being
clever... which is it?


I didn't make up that silly bafflegab, you did. As those
things go, it was pretty good.


Your reply is most revealing as to your
ignorance in this regard!


Hi Chuck,

It may be regarded as ignorance, especially when your claim is
unsubstantiated and demands that your proof is available only through
a privileged knowledge. However being ignorant is not the same as
being stupid. The onus is upon you to show (resolve ignorance or
exhibit it in your own thinking - there are no third options) how your
claim is substantial - testimonial is insufficient.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hi Richard,
I suspect Chuck's phrase is little more than an attempt to
seem technically erudite without, alas, conveying any information to the
reader. In short, bafflegab if done intentionally, self deceit otherwise.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH