Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George, W5YR" wrote in message ...
.... I think that a great deal of confusion over this whole issue comes from two sources: 1. vague efforts to apply the infamous "Maximum Power Transfer Theorem" from the early days in undergrad EE school; and 2. confusing an r-f transmitter output stage with the classical "signal generator" with a dissipative 50-ohm internal resistance. Forget both of those irritants and concentrate on the required load for the transmitter, which the designer will provide and insist upon, and then adjust the antenna system to provide that load and all will be well. Those of us who _do_ have to worry, in intimate detail, about generator source impedances, are most thankful that we do NOT when we put loads on our ham rigs. Thanks for a great posting that nicely summarizes what a lot of us have been saying for a long time. Perhaps Reg is right. Perhaps we SHOULD quit calling it an SWR meter and instead call it a "Transmitter Load Indicator" (or perhaps transmitter load error indicator). When you plug an appliance into the mains, do you worry about what the mains source impedance is, so long as it's low enough to maintain the proper voltage? When you connect speakers to an amplifier, do you worry about what the source impedance is, so long as it's low enough to not materially affect damping? If not, why would you worry about transmitter source impedance? Why would you not worry instead about proving the proper load so the amplifier can do it's job right? Cheers, Tom |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
proper voltage? When you connect speakers to an amplifier, do you
worry about what the source impedance is, so long as it's low enough to not materially affect damping? If not, why would you worry about I would not go there on the audio . The speakers do need to match the design of the amp just as the load on a transmitter needs to match the design impedance. Most power output devices are designed to produce maximum power and /or minimum distortion into a specific load. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ralph Mowery" wrote:
proper voltage? When you connect speakers to an amplifier, do you worry about what the source impedance is, so long as it's low enough to not materially affect damping? If not, why would you worry about I would not go there on the audio . The speakers do need to match the design of the amp just as the load on a transmitter needs to match the design impedance. Most power output devices are designed to produce maximum power and /or minimum distortion into a specific load. Virtually all "HiFi" audio amplifiers are designed to have "damping" factor of something significantly more than 10. Damping factor is the ratio of the load impedance to the amplifier's output impedance. You might even find a few (more expensive units) that have ratios greater than 1000, which is to say that the output impedance of the amp (designed to drive speakers in the range of 4 to 16 Ohms), has an output impedance of 4/1000 of an Ohm). Just as with RF, the output impedance has little to do with the power delivered to the load impedance. The amplifier can generate a maximum voltage by design, and how much power is actually delivered depends solely on the impedance of the load. Hence the same amplifier can deliver twice the power to a 4 Ohm speaker as it can to an 8 Ohm speaker, and that is twice what it will deliver to a 16 Ohm speaker. And it also works just fine to drive a 600 Ohm headset, with significantly less power. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://web.newsguy.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ralph Mowery" wrote in message ...
proper voltage? When you connect speakers to an amplifier, do you worry about what the source impedance is, so long as it's low enough to not materially affect damping? If not, why would you worry about I would not go there on the audio . The speakers do need to match the design of the amp just as the load on a transmitter needs to match the design impedance. Most power output devices are designed to produce maximum power and /or minimum distortion into a specific load. Just my point, Ralph... you should worry about your speakers being within the range of LOAD impedances that the amplifier is designed for, but you seldom would worry about the SOURCE impedance. You should worry about the antenna-load you present to your transmitter or amplifier being within the range of impedances for which the transmitter or amplifier is designed, but why worry about the transmitter or amplifier source impedance? (Some folk worry about audio amp damping factor, but it tends to be grossly overemphasized...see postings over the years by Dick Pierce in the audio groups for the simple explanation why it doesn't matter all that much.) Cheers, Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tom Bruhns" wrote:
...... Perhaps Reg is right. Perhaps we SHOULD quit calling it an SWR meter and instead call it a "Transmitter Load Indicator" (or perhaps transmitter load error indicator). I propose that we call it a "Reflected Energy Guessimator", or REG for short. Jim, K7JEB k7jeb(at)arrl(dot)net Glendale, AZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |