Richard Clark wrote:

W5DXP wrote:
What constitutes the silence from this point on?

Nobody knows and nobody cares.

Then I count you in that group who finds the additional 1.62dB loss as
inconsequential. I also note you have no answer to the question, but
in that regard I wish you well, and we are both content.

I think everyone appreciates the fact that if he/she destroys the efficiency
of his/her transmitter by whatever means, then that is not inconsequential.
But that's not really what the discussion is about, is it? SWR doesn't depend
upon the efficiency of the transmitter, does it?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----