LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 4th 04, 11:34 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004 15:19:41 -0500, "John Smith"
wrote:

Here are the results computed from the data:

Freq (MHz) Impedance (Ohms)

410 46.4 + 6.0i (50 Ohm terminator)

380 9.7 - 12.5
390 3.5 - 5.7
400 5.1 + 1.3i
410 5.1 + 6.5i
415 4.0 + 10.0i
425 2.5 + 15.7i


Hi John,

How about the raw data? How about a detailed description of the NARDA
coupler? It should have a calibration plate affixed to the side of it
with freq vs. coupling marks (generally pretty close).

I would note you have a considerable SWR, but this was expected going
into the test (however, in an inverse proportion, which may be
meaningful here).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Natural balun/Antenna John Smith Antenna 14 September 29th 04 06:11 PM
Wideband VHF Yagi - Do I have to use a folded dipole configuration? Richard Antenna 15 June 3rd 04 03:43 PM
Confirm the resonant frequency of this folded dipole Richard Antenna 6 May 30th 04 05:00 PM
Tuning a folded Dipole? ZL3VML Antenna 1 December 25th 03 12:10 PM
Folded dipole? Cliff Gieseke Antenna 7 August 28th 03 09:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017