Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, then, Cecil and I have described a couple that generally out perform
other approaches. Big screwdrivers. 73 H. NQ5H "Rick Frazier" wrote in message ... OK, so how about a slightly different method of describing what I'm looking for: " an antenna with considerably higher efficiency than the ATAS-120 I now have " smile --Rick Dave wrote: "high efficiency mobile hf antenna" that must win some kind of award for the longest oxymoron in radio speak. "Rick Frazier" wrote in message ... Looking for suggestions for a high efficiency mobile antenna for HF. I'd like to be able to cover 80-10m, and don't mind stopping to change out sticks to change bands, so long as I don't have to retune each time. I'll be mounting the base at bumper level off of the left side of my pickup (offset from hitch mount), and can probably deal with 9 or 10 feet total height from the mount. I have an Atas-120 currently mounted at the back edge of the roof, with it's base at roof level, but am not impressed with it's performance and am looking for something with higher efficiency. The convenience of automatic tuning with my FT-857 is less of a convenience than I thought it'd be, especially considering it doesn't seem to have good efficiency. Any Ideas? Thanks --Rick AH7H |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Save your $$. I was in the same spot you are and went for the Tarheel and
the W4RT auto tuner box. $500 or so later, I A/B compared my old roof mounted ATAS 100 against my full size Tarheel on the bumper and the ATAS was so close on 20 and above, I could not tell the difference. On 40, the Tarheel was a slight favorite. Of course the ATAS does not run 80. Theory: mounted up higher the lower efficiency ATAS overcomes its shortfall because it has lower ground losses than the bumper mounted larger antenna. Some modeling I did with G4FGQ's MIDLOAD seemed to confirm that would be the case. Another way to consider it: Mobile operating is unique in that signals had better be pretty strong to begin with or you won't hear the station over the cab noise, QSB from moving past a truck and RFI from the cars around you. To say the full size screwdriver is two S units better on 40 means nothing because you couldn't understand an S2 signal on the full size either. If the signals are strong enough, an S9 on the full size is just as copiable at S7 on the ATAS and is enough to get the job done. -- Radio K4ia Craig "Buck" Fredericksburg, VA USA FISTS 6702 cc 788 Diamond 64 "Rick Frazier" wrote in message ... Looking for suggestions for a high efficiency mobile antenna for HF. I'd like to be able to cover 80-10m, and don't mind stopping to change out sticks to change bands, so long as I don't have to retune each time. I'll be mounting the base at bumper level off of the left side of my pickup (offset from hitch mount), and can probably deal with 9 or 10 feet total height from the mount. I have an Atas-120 currently mounted at the back edge of the roof, with it's base at roof level, but am not impressed with it's performance and am looking for something with higher efficiency. The convenience of automatic tuning with my FT-857 is less of a convenience than I thought it'd be, especially considering it doesn't seem to have good efficiency. Any Ideas? Thanks --Rick AH7H |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Craig Buck" wrote in message
Another way to consider it: Mobile operating is unique in that signals had better be pretty strong to begin with or you won't hear the station over the cab noise, QSB from moving past a truck and RFI from the cars around you. To say the full size screwdriver is two S units better on 40 means nothing because you couldn't understand an S2 signal on the full size either. If the signals are strong enough, an S9 on the full size is just as copiable at S7 on the ATAS and is enough to get the job done. Of course. The receiving s/n ratio *should* be about the same on anything you use, being you have way more signal than you need with even the worst antenna. Or at least on the lower bands. But that 2 s units can mean a lot to whoever you are talking to, if the noise levels are high. I wouldn't say it means nothing. Thats like switching on an amplifier. MK |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |