Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 8th 04, 11:36 AM
H. Adam Stevens, NQ5H
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, then, Cecil and I have described a couple that generally out perform
other approaches.
Big screwdrivers.
73
H.
NQ5H

"Rick Frazier" wrote in message
...
OK, so how about a slightly different method of describing what I'm
looking
for:

" an antenna with considerably higher efficiency than the ATAS-120 I now
have
"

smile

--Rick

Dave wrote:

"high efficiency mobile hf antenna" that must win some kind of award for
the longest oxymoron in radio speak.

"Rick Frazier" wrote in message
...
Looking for suggestions for a high efficiency mobile antenna for HF.
I'd like to be able to cover 80-10m, and don't mind stopping to change
out sticks to change bands, so long as I don't have to retune each
time.

I'll be mounting the base at bumper level off of the left side of my
pickup (offset from hitch mount), and can probably deal with 9 or 10
feet total height from the mount.

I have an Atas-120 currently mounted at the back edge of the roof,
with
it's base at roof level, but am not impressed with it's performance and
am looking for something with higher efficiency. The convenience of
automatic tuning with my FT-857 is less of a convenience than I thought
it'd be, especially considering it doesn't seem to have good
efficiency.

Any Ideas?

Thanks
--Rick AH7H






  #12   Report Post  
Old October 9th 04, 02:43 AM
Craig Buck
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Save your $$. I was in the same spot you are and went for the Tarheel and
the W4RT auto tuner box. $500 or so later, I A/B compared my old roof
mounted ATAS 100 against my full size Tarheel on the bumper and the ATAS was
so close on 20 and above, I could not tell the difference. On 40, the
Tarheel was a slight favorite. Of course the ATAS does not run 80.

Theory: mounted up higher the lower efficiency ATAS overcomes its shortfall
because it has lower ground losses than the bumper mounted larger antenna.
Some modeling I did with G4FGQ's MIDLOAD seemed to confirm that would be the
case.

Another way to consider it: Mobile operating is unique in that signals had
better be pretty strong to begin with or you won't hear the station over the
cab noise, QSB from moving past a truck and RFI from the cars around you.
To say the full size screwdriver is two S units better on 40 means nothing
because you couldn't understand an S2 signal on the full size either. If
the signals are strong enough, an S9 on the full size is just as copiable at
S7 on the ATAS and is enough to get the job done.
--
Radio K4ia
Craig "Buck"
Fredericksburg, VA USA
FISTS 6702 cc 788 Diamond 64

"Rick Frazier" wrote in message
...
Looking for suggestions for a high efficiency mobile antenna for HF.
I'd like to be able to cover 80-10m, and don't mind stopping to change
out sticks to change bands, so long as I don't have to retune each time.

I'll be mounting the base at bumper level off of the left side of my
pickup (offset from hitch mount), and can probably deal with 9 or 10
feet total height from the mount.

I have an Atas-120 currently mounted at the back edge of the roof, with
it's base at roof level, but am not impressed with it's performance and
am looking for something with higher efficiency. The convenience of
automatic tuning with my FT-857 is less of a convenience than I thought
it'd be, especially considering it doesn't seem to have good efficiency.

Any Ideas?

Thanks
--Rick AH7H





  #13   Report Post  
Old October 9th 04, 09:41 AM
Mark Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Craig Buck" wrote in message

Another way to consider it: Mobile operating is unique in that signals had
better be pretty strong to begin with or you won't hear the station over the
cab noise, QSB from moving past a truck and RFI from the cars around you.
To say the full size screwdriver is two S units better on 40 means nothing
because you couldn't understand an S2 signal on the full size either. If
the signals are strong enough, an S9 on the full size is just as copiable at
S7 on the ATAS and is enough to get the job done.


Of course. The receiving s/n ratio *should* be about the same on
anything you use, being you have way more signal than you need with
even the worst antenna. Or at least on the lower bands. But that 2 s
units can mean a lot to whoever you are talking to, if the noise
levels are high. I wouldn't say it means nothing. Thats like switching
on an amplifier. MK
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017