| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Among the posters on this topic, I'd be willing to bet a substantial sum
that at least Tom, Ian, Cecil, Bill, and I can recite that formula from memory. In addition, there are a number of other regular and occasional newsgroup posters in this category who've been wise enough to not having posted on this thread, and some who have posted whom I don't know well enough to put my money on. I'd be willing to further bet that Ian, Cecil, Bill, and I could have done so at any time for at least the last 20 years. I omit Tom from this second list only because I haven't yet met him in person and otherwise haven't gotten any hints of his age -- but I'll take a gamble and spot him 10 years at least. Furthermore, we all know how to use it, and have done so countless times in the process of designing systems that work. I'm glad you've discovered this equation. Learn what it means and how to use it, and you've taken a good first step toward understanding transmission line phenomena. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Dr. Slick wrote: From Pozar's Microwave Engineering (Pg. 606): Reflection Coefficient looking into load = (Zl-Zo)/(Zl+Zo) Where Zl is a purely real load impedance, and Zo is the purely real characteristic impedance reference. When you change Zo, you change the normalized center of the Smith Chart, and therefore the Reflection Coefficient and SWR, looking into the same load. Check it out... Slick |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Roy Lewallen wrote in message ...
.... I omit Tom from this second list only because I haven't yet met him in person and otherwise haven't gotten any hints of his age -- but I'll take a gamble and spot him 10 years at least. Well, you can find archived postings from me from 10 years ago that I think demonstrate that I understood how SWR meters actually work back then. And you could probably find my name on a patent that would give you a clue that I was at least starting to learn a little something about transmission lines in 1969 or so, though I readily admit to not worrying about "reflection coefficient" back then. Just hacked through the raw, unabridged transmission line equations. I suppose Reg would think that a better way to learn the stuff anyway. I had bought the King, Mimno and Wing book back then, but didn't get around to actually reading it till much, much later. Cheers, Tom |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||