Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Among the posters on this topic, I'd be willing to bet a substantial sum
that at least Tom, Ian, Cecil, Bill, and I can recite that formula from memory. In addition, there are a number of other regular and occasional newsgroup posters in this category who've been wise enough to not having posted on this thread, and some who have posted whom I don't know well enough to put my money on. I'd be willing to further bet that Ian, Cecil, Bill, and I could have done so at any time for at least the last 20 years. I omit Tom from this second list only because I haven't yet met him in person and otherwise haven't gotten any hints of his age -- but I'll take a gamble and spot him 10 years at least. Furthermore, we all know how to use it, and have done so countless times in the process of designing systems that work. I'm glad you've discovered this equation. Learn what it means and how to use it, and you've taken a good first step toward understanding transmission line phenomena. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Dr. Slick wrote: From Pozar's Microwave Engineering (Pg. 606): Reflection Coefficient looking into load = (Zl-Zo)/(Zl+Zo) Where Zl is a purely real load impedance, and Zo is the purely real characteristic impedance reference. When you change Zo, you change the normalized center of the Smith Chart, and therefore the Reflection Coefficient and SWR, looking into the same load. Check it out... Slick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |