Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 17:39:37 -0400, Pat wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:11:11 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 07:35:35 -0400, Pat wrote: Sounds good. As an aside, I just watched a youtube video of someone trying out one of these magnetic loop antennas. With his particular set of circumstances, it reduced the noise floor on 80 meters significantly. Compared to what other antenna? He probably reduced the received signal strength by the same amount leaving the SNR unchanged. Not really. Both signal and noise are reduced, but the SNR must be better because you can hear an SSB conversation with the loop that is not there with his sloper. Search youtube for MFJ-1886 and N9BC. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECDklLp2FOk (2:56) Nice of him to crop off most of the spectrum analyzer display at the top of the screen so that I couldn't see the SNR changes. Also, he didn't indicate which antenna he was testing in the first video. He mostly fixed those problems in the 2nd video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-GPS1Kqfec (4:13) Of course, there is no mention of antenna patterns. Maybe the QSO he was listening to is in a null or his other antenna. Not enough info to really tell. Nice of him to compress the signal strength in the spectrum display so that it's difficult to compare SNR between antennas. There might be a difference between antennas, but my guess(tm) is that he has the AGC turned off in his SDR receiver. If AGC were on, the base line noise level would be about the same for both receivers, which would raise some questions as to whether there really was a difference. With the AGC turned off, the higher gain of the sloper antenna will show more baseline noise, which is what your seeing on the spectrum display. However, if I freeze the 2nd video for each antenna, and just look at the RELATIVE levels of the signals to the base line noise levels for each antenna, I think you'll see that they're fairly close[1]. That's the SNR which is what's important, and not the absolute levels of the noise and signal. Please note that the MJF-1886 is an amplified broadband untuned loop which means it has a rather low Q. It obtains no benefits from the narrowing the receive bandwidth as would be found in a high-Q transmit loop. Strong signals anywhere in the 1-30MHz amplifier bandwidth will create intermod products which might land where you're listening. Incidentally, if you disconnect the MJF-1886 amplifier, and use it like the PA0RDT miniwhip, my guess(tm) is that the loop and the miniwhip will work almost identically. Ok, Methinks I see the problem. The MFJ-1886 looks too good. With antennas, the uglier it looks, the better it works. Nice looking antennas just don't seem to work well. [1] I have a customer on the phone who wants my attention so this will need to wait. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Re Magnetic Loop !!! | Antenna | |||
Magnetic Loop !!! | Antenna | |||
MFJ 1786 magnetic loop | Antenna | |||
Magnetic loop for sale | Equipment | |||
Magnetic loop for sale | Equipment |