Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rickman wrote:
Roger Hayter wrote on 7/26/2017 7:39 PM: snip It is really not my fault if you use the word converse when you don't know what it means. The dictionary says that antennas is a second variant 'especially' used for radio aerials, it certainly doesn't say it is exclusive usage in this context. Growing popularity is from my own observation of the literature, antennae is widely used in UK 1930s publications. And I do resent pompous ****s who can barely speak English calling *me* an idiot. You do realize this is a newsgroup, no? An amateur radio newsgroup at that. You expect people like these to be respectful? I'm an optimist living in a constant state of disappointment. But, seriously, while Gareth is 70 years (and a major war with technical cooperation on the allied side) too late to get rid of 'antennas', there is also a respectable history of use of 'antennae' in a radio context, albeit a dying usage. -- Roger Hayter |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Full Wave Horizontal Loop | Shortwave | |||
Cophasing Two Full-Wave Loops? | Antenna | |||
Full-wave coaxial loop? | Antenna | |||
Full Wave Loop Question | Antenna | |||
Question about Full Wave loop | Antenna |