Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
I would urge any young person who reads this and wants to understand electromagnetics to get a good book on the subject, read what the authors say, and forget what Richard just posted. He's all wrong. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH See what I mean? I urge any young person to read the book about jerks. The key to understanding the total current in standing-wave antennas is in understanding the forward current and reflected current components and their superposition at different points along the antenna. The cosine distribution of standing-wave current in a 1/2WL dipole is the result of the superposition of forward-traveling current and rearward-traveling reflected current. An unterminated rhombic is a standing-wave antenna because the forward current gets reflected at the open end of the wire. The forward current causes radiation in the forward direction and the reflected current causes radiation in the rearward direction. The radiation "loss" causes the reflected current at the feedpoint to be a lower magnitude than the forward current at the feedpoint. There are standing waves all up and down an unterminated rhombic and the Vtot/Itot feedpoint impedance depends partially upon the phase between the forward current and reflected current and, of course, upon their magnitudes. Properly terminating a rhombic virtually eliminates reflections and turns the antenna into a traveling-wave antenna which radiates mostly in the forward direction. There are virtually no standing waves on such an antenna. These same ideas can be applied to other standing-wave antennas, including a 1/2WL inverted-V. In EZNEC, we can terminate the ends of such an antenna to ground through resistors that eliminate standing waves on the antenna. The feedpoint impedance of such an antenna is in the ballpark of 600 ohms. Where does the low feedpoint impedance of an unterminated 1/2WL inverted-V come from? It comes from the superposition of the forward current and the reflected current at the feedpoint. These two components are in phase and phasor-add to a large current. The two voltage components are 180 deg out of phase and add to a small voltage. small-voltage/large-current is a low feedpoint impedance. Using a minus sign for 180 degrees, the feedpoint impedance of an inverted-V is approximately (Vf-Vr)/(If+Ir). We can understand a standing-wave antenna by doing an analysis of a lossy piece of transmission line. If the losses in the transmission line approximately equal the radiation "loss" of the antenna, the feedpoint impedances will have approximately the same value. Once standing-wave antenna currents are understood, it is easy to see why the total superposed currents at each end of a 75m Bugcatcher coil are nowhere near equal even though the forward current and reflected current at each end of the coil are close to the same value. Circuit analysis works well when there is only one current flowing in a coil. Circuit analysis falls apart when forward and reflected currents are flowing in a coil and distributed network analysis is required when such coils are installed in standing-wave antennas. -- 73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |