Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH wrote:
"There may be a difference in current along the coil, but it isn`t a
current drop."


He wrote that about four times, what's the point of it? Smart Alec attitude?

If there is something you believe is wrong and you know better, than please
correct us stupid hams.

Thanks for your patience Richard, KB5WZI, you are one of few decent posters
here.

73 Yuri, K3BU

Why should I? You wouldn't believe me anyway since you and Richard are
wedded to your own fractured version of electromagnetics. Besides, Tom
Rauch does a good enough job on his web page.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH

Why should I? You wouldn't believe me anyway since you and Richard are
wedded to your own fractured version of electromagnetics. Besides, Tom
Rauch does a good enough job on his web page.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH



Thank you, you just 'splained yourself, one of those....

Yuri

Tom Donaly wrote:
Besides, Tom Rauch does a good enough job on his web page.

Tom Rauch uses a circuit analysis when he should be using a
distributed network analysis. That's an easy mistake to make
and a hard mistake to admit.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---