Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian
Would you please describe for me the physical arrangement of an IDEAL inductance. I cannot visulise such a thing as I only have seen 'coiled ' inductors ,where each coil has a scientific and analytical relationship to its adjacent coils which thus CREATE an inductance and without which an 'inductance' cannot occur. I don't want to enter the augument that is ensuing on this thread but just want to be sure that there is not an inductance available that is not generated by proximity to other items including its own content (wire length) Using chemical terms, is it an element or a compound if you get my drift , since you later mention that 'inductance.' has a "fundamental physical property................." that does not change regardles of a proximity situation. i.e. Self sufficient.? TIA Art "Ian White, G3SEK" wrote in message news ![]() Cecil Moore wrote: I want you to stop and think a moment, about how an IDEAL INDUCTANCE behaves in an antenna. (Sorry to shout, but every time I type "ideal inductance" quietly, you seem to read something else :-) Ian, please take your own advice. It's pretty obvious that you are thinking about an IDEAL INDUCTANCE in terms of a lumped circuit analysis which is invalid when analyzing a STANDING-WAVE ANTENNA. It makes life easier to compartmentalize your scientific world-view in that way.... but it is deeply, fundamentally wrong. In reality, all true scientific knowledge joins up seamlessly - that's how we *know* it's true! If we can't see how it joins up, that means we still have work to do. Dividing it into compartments that don't join up is lazy and will always lead you false. A fundamental physical property like inductance doesn't change its behaviour depending on the situation it finds itself in. If you cut the antenna wire and insert an ideal, lumped inductance, that inductance will behave in exactly the same way as it does in any other circuit. If you really looked hard at the math of antennas considered as transmission lines, you would find there is no problem whatever about inserting an ideal inductance, with no difference in current between its two terminals. -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |