Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A good way to check the validity of an EZNEC helix model is to create
the helix by itself, run a wire from one end of the helix to the other right through the middle of the helix, and put a source in the middle of the wire. Specify a low enough frequency that the helix will be small in terms of wavelength. I've found the source reactance to compare quite favorably with the reactance of the inductance calculated by Reg's program for the same physical dimensions. The self resonant frequency comes out quite close, also. The Q should be in the same ballpark, provided wire loss is included in the model, although radiation will lower it some in the EZNEC model. (The source resistance with wire loss set to zero is the radiation resistance. As long as it's much lower than the resistance with wire loss included, the effect of radiation will be small. If it's not much lower, reduce the frequency.) As I mentioned before, EZNEC doesn't model proximity effect (significant only when the turns are pretty closely spaced) but I don't think Reg's program includes proximity effect, either. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |