Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the correction regarding proximity effect. In that case,
Reg's program should report the loss more accurately than EZNEC when the turns are very closely spaced. Yes, indeed, EZNEC does account for the capacitance -- it comes about from the coupling of fields between turns, which is at the heart of the fundamental NEC-2 electromagnetic field calculations. As I said, the self-resonant frequency reported by EZNEC is pretty close to that calculated by your program. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Reg Edwards wrote: EZNEC doesn't model proximity effect (significant only when the turns are pretty closely spaced) but I don't think Reg's program includes proximity effect, either. Roy Lewallen, W7EL ====================================== Yes it does! But you can forget it. It doesn't matter except when calculating efficiency. It has no affect on how the thing works which is what you are all so-aggressively fighting about. You'll soon be using assault weapons. Program "Loadcoil" also includes the ALL-IMPORTANT COIL CAPACITANCE (which I suspect Eznec does not - I never use it) - the existence of which the whole set of you block-heads, so-called electrical engineers, appear to be entirely ignorant. We ARE dealing with alternating currents. Oh Boy - I enjoyed typing that! ;o) ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |