LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old October 21st 04, 05:44 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Donaly wrote:
you've hit the nail squarely on the head. The validity of
the whole argument boils down to whether or not you can safely neglect
the effects of the physical dimensions of the inductor on the behavior
of the antenna. It looks to me as if you can, but some of the other
fellows on this newsgroup seem to be as much interested in
characterizing Tom Rauch as a rat as they are in verifying some
antenna effects due to the properties of real loading coils.


You guys have completely missed the point. The argument is not about
the behavior of the antenna. The original argument is/was about the
current in a real-world antenna loading coil. The behavior of the
antenna is irrelevant to that original argument.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils Wes Stewart Antenna 480 February 22nd 04 02:12 AM
Current in antenna loading coils controversy Yuri Blanarovich Antenna 454 December 12th 03 03:39 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017