| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jimmie wrote:
And it will radiate, assuming no other changes but the geometry of the antenna.. When the out of phase componts of the radiation reach a receiving antenna they will destructivly combine. If it actually radiates and if that radiation destructively combines at one receiving antenna, then radiation must constructively combine at another (potential) receiving antenna, or else the conservation of energy principle would be violated. Any far-field destructive interference event must be exactly balanced by an equal magnitude constructive interference event at some other location in the far-field. If there is a receiving antenna there, it will experience gain over the first location. And a coiled up antenna is likely to experience a lot of I^2*R losses. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Lumped Load Models v. Distributed Coils | Antenna | |||
| Current in antenna loading coils controversy | Antenna | |||
| Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna | |||